AUIAF
Price
$0.17
Change
+$0.01 (+6.25%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
23.41M
EGO
Price
$21.32
Change
-$0.14 (-0.65%)
Updated
Jun 16, 02:03 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.86B
45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AUIAF vs EGO

Header iconAUIAF vs EGO Comparison
Open Charts AUIAF vs EGOBanner chart's image
Aurania Resources
Price$0.17
Change+$0.01 (+6.25%)
Volume$854
Capitalization23.41M
Eldorado Gold
Price$21.32
Change-$0.14 (-0.65%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.86B
AUIAF vs EGO Comparison Chart
Loading...
EGO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUIAF vs. EGO commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUIAF is a Hold and EGO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (AUIAF: $0.17 vs. EGO: $21.46)
Brand notoriety: AUIAF and EGO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUIAF: 3% vs. EGO: 127%
Market capitalization -- AUIAF: $23.41M vs. EGO: $2.86B
AUIAF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $23.41M. EGO’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUIAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEGO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AUIAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EGO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EGO is a better buy in the long-term than AUIAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EGO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • EGO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

AUIAF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +13.20% price change this week, while EGO (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +19.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +51.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

EGO is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.38% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EGO($2.86B) has a higher market cap than AUIAF($23.4M). EGO YTD gains are higher at: 44.317 vs. AUIAF (-40.546). EGO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 458M vs. AUIAF (-11.12M). EGO has more cash in the bank: 544M vs. AUIAF (367K). AUIAF has less debt than EGO: AUIAF (7.78M) vs EGO (659M). EGO has higher revenues than AUIAF: EGO (1.01B) vs AUIAF (0).
AUIAFEGOAUIAF / EGO
Capitalization23.4M2.86B1%
EBITDA-11.12M458M-2%
Gain YTD-40.54644.317-91%
P/E RatioN/A26.63-
Revenue01.01B-
Total Cash367K544M0%
Total Debt7.78M659M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUIAF vs EGO: Fundamental Ratings
AUIAF
EGO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10032
SMR RATING
1..100
10074
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9038
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10093
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AUIAF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EGO (86) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AUIAF’s stock grew significantly faster than EGO’s over the last 12 months.

EGO's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for AUIAF (100) in the null industry. This means that EGO’s stock grew significantly faster than AUIAF’s over the last 12 months.

EGO's SMR Rating (74) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AUIAF (100) in the null industry. This means that EGO’s stock grew similarly to AUIAF’s over the last 12 months.

EGO's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AUIAF (90) in the null industry. This means that EGO’s stock grew somewhat faster than AUIAF’s over the last 12 months.

EGO's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AUIAF (100) in the null industry. This means that EGO’s stock grew similarly to AUIAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EGO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EGO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBTG22.860.01
+0.04%
iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Tr ETF
FDWM23.23-0.30
-1.28%
Fidelity Women's Leadership ETF
FNGO98.22-2.07
-2.06%
MicroSectors™ FANG+™ 2X Leveraged ETN
FDTX36.50-0.78
-2.09%
Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF
HIBL35.11-2.05
-5.52%
Direxion Daily S&P 500® Hi Bt Bl 3X ETF

AUIAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AUIAF and EGO have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AUIAF and EGO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUIAF
1D Price
Change %
AUIAF100%
+5.60%
EGO - AUIAF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
SSVRF - AUIAF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.03%
BBBXF - AUIAF
14%
Poorly correlated
-8.29%
BELGF - AUIAF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
ASWRF - AUIAF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+6.15%
More