AUMBF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.02 (-18.18%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
CRNLF
Price
$4.35
Change
+$0.21 (+5.07%)
Updated
Dec 5 closing price
Ad is loading...

AUMBF vs CRNLF

Header iconAUMBF vs CRNLF Comparison
Open Charts AUMBF vs CRNLFBanner chart's image
1911 Gold
Price$0.09
Change-$0.02 (-18.18%)
Volume$488.34K
CapitalizationN/A
CAPRICORN METALS
Price$4.35
Change+$0.21 (+5.07%)
Volume$478
CapitalizationN/A
AUMBF vs CRNLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
AUMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CRNLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUMBF vs. CRNLF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUMBF is a Sell and CRNLF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (AUMBF: $0.09 vs. CRNLF: $4.35)
Brand notoriety: AUMBF and CRNLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUMBF: 196% vs. CRNLF: 100%
Market capitalization -- AUMBF: $4.89M vs. CRNLF: $1.11B
AUMBF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $4.89M. CRNLF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUMBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCRNLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AUMBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CRNLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AUMBF and CRNLF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUMBF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CRNLF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AUMBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CRNLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CRNLF is a better buy in the short-term than AUMBF.

Price Growth

AUMBF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -22.73% price change this week, while CRNLF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRNLF($1.11B) has a higher market cap than AUMBF($4.89M). AUMBF YTD gains are higher at: 81.803 vs. CRNLF (40.323). CRNLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 154M vs. AUMBF (-5.91M). CRNLF has more cash in the bank: 45.8M vs. AUMBF (356K). CRNLF has higher revenues than AUMBF: CRNLF (307M) vs AUMBF (5.94M).
AUMBFCRNLFAUMBF / CRNLF
Capitalization4.89M1.11B0%
EBITDA-5.91M154M-4%
Gain YTD81.80340.323203%
P/E RatioN/A21.65-
Revenue5.94M307M2%
Total Cash356K45.8M1%
Total DebtN/A253K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUMBF: Fundamental Ratings
AUMBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
66
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUMBFCRNLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
12%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
10%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
86%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
78%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AUMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CRNLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLMAX9.72N/A
N/A
Meeder Muirfield Adviser
BCREX15.13-0.06
-0.39%
BlackRock Real Estate Securities Inv C
PRILX61.70-0.31
-0.50%
Parnassus Core Equity Institutional
FAQIX14.69-0.15
-1.01%
Nuveen Dividend Value I
OFSFX22.38-0.33
-1.45%
Olstein Strategic Opportunities Adviser

AUMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AUMBF and SLVMF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AUMBF and SLVMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUMBF
1D Price
Change %
AUMBF100%
+0.82%
SLVMF - AUMBF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDVMF - AUMBF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
DRD - AUMBF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
EGO - AUMBF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
IEGCF - AUMBF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.45%
More

CRNLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CRNLF and ARBTF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRNLF and ARBTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRNLF
1D Price
Change %
CRNLF100%
N/A
ARBTF - CRNLF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JDNRF - CRNLF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KTGDF - CRNLF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUMBF - CRNLF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
WGXRF - CRNLF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.50%
More