AUMBF
Price
$0.21
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
50.64M
DRD
Price
$17.68
Change
-$0.39 (-2.16%)
Updated
Aug 28, 11:20 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.58B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AUMBF vs DRD

Header iconAUMBF vs DRD Comparison
Open Charts AUMBF vs DRDBanner chart's image
1911 Gold
Price$0.21
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$494.78K
Capitalization50.64M
DRDGOLD
Price$17.68
Change-$0.39 (-2.16%)
Volume$480
Capitalization1.58B
AUMBF vs DRD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AUMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DRD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUMBF vs. DRD commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUMBF is a StrongBuy and DRD is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (AUMBF: $0.21 vs. DRD: $18.07)
Brand notoriety: AUMBF and DRD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUMBF: 135% vs. DRD: 164%
Market capitalization -- AUMBF: $50.64M vs. DRD: $1.58B
AUMBF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $50.64M. DRD’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUMBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDRD’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AUMBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • DRD’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, DRD is a better buy in the long-term than AUMBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUMBF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DRD’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AUMBF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • DRD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DRD is a better buy in the short-term than AUMBF.

Price Growth

AUMBF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +14.25% price change this week, while DRD (@Precious Metals) price change was +17.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4218.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.80% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DRD($1.58B) has a higher market cap than AUMBF($50.6M). DRD YTD gains are higher at: 111.825 vs. AUMBF (100.049). DRD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.79B vs. AUMBF (-12.99M). DRD has more cash in the bank: 661M vs. AUMBF (4.04M). DRD has higher revenues than AUMBF: DRD (7.07B) vs AUMBF (0).
AUMBFDRDAUMBF / DRD
Capitalization50.6M1.58B3%
EBITDA-12.99M2.79B-0%
Gain YTD100.049111.82589%
P/E RatioN/A16.14-
Revenue07.07B-
Total Cash4.04M661M1%
Total DebtN/A22.2M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUMBF vs DRD: Fundamental Ratings
AUMBF
DRD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2486
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10055
SMR RATING
1..100
9624
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4037
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10012
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DRD's Valuation (15) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AUMBF (47) in the null industry. This means that DRD’s stock grew similarly to AUMBF’s over the last 12 months.

DRD's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AUMBF (100) in the null industry. This means that DRD’s stock grew somewhat faster than AUMBF’s over the last 12 months.

DRD's SMR Rating (24) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for AUMBF (96) in the null industry. This means that DRD’s stock grew significantly faster than AUMBF’s over the last 12 months.

DRD's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AUMBF (40) in the null industry. This means that DRD’s stock grew similarly to AUMBF’s over the last 12 months.

DRD's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for AUMBF (100) in the null industry. This means that DRD’s stock grew significantly faster than AUMBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUMBFDRD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AUMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DRD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AUEIX21.790.06
+0.28%
AQR Large Cap Defensive Style I
SCHLX40.63N/A
N/A
DWS Health and Wellness S
SHAPX38.34N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Appreciation A
HDCAX10.21N/A
N/A
Rational Equity Armor Fund A
BIAHX18.46N/A
N/A
Brown Advisory WMC Strat Eurp Eq Inv

AUMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AUMBF and SLVMF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AUMBF and SLVMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUMBF
1D Price
Change %
AUMBF100%
-1.03%
SLVMF - AUMBF
31%
Poorly correlated
-31.54%
EDVMF - AUMBF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
DRD - AUMBF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.74%
EGO - AUMBF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
IEGCF - AUMBF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
More

DRD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DRD has been closely correlated with HMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DRD jumps, then HMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DRD
1D Price
Change %
DRD100%
-2.74%
HMY - DRD
80%
Closely correlated
-2.91%
GFI - DRD
79%
Closely correlated
-0.88%
AEM - DRD
76%
Closely correlated
-0.12%
AU - DRD
76%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
WPM - DRD
74%
Closely correlated
-0.12%
More