AUMBF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.01 (-5.56%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
4.89M
DRD
Price
$14.05
Change
-$0.19 (-1.33%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
725.01M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AUMBF vs DRD

Header iconAUMBF vs DRD Comparison
Open Charts AUMBF vs DRDBanner chart's image
1911 Gold
Price$0.17
Change-$0.01 (-5.56%)
Volume$922.37K
Capitalization4.89M
DRDGOLD
Price$14.05
Change-$0.19 (-1.33%)
Volume$271.82K
Capitalization725.01M
AUMBF vs DRD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AUMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DRD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUMBF vs. DRD commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUMBF is a StrongBuy and DRD is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (AUMBF: $0.17 vs. DRD: $14.05)
Brand notoriety: AUMBF and DRD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUMBF: 223% vs. DRD: 63%
Market capitalization -- AUMBF: $4.89M vs. DRD: $725.01M
AUMBF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $4.89M. DRD’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $725.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUMBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDRD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AUMBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • DRD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, DRD is a better buy in the long-term than AUMBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUMBF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DRD’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AUMBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • DRD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AUMBF is a better buy in the short-term than DRD.

Price Growth

AUMBF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +4.83% price change this week, while DRD (@Precious Metals) price change was +2.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

AUMBF is expected to report earnings on May 22, 2025.

DRD is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.16% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DRD($725M) has a higher market cap than AUMBF($4.89M). AUMBF YTD gains are higher at: 68.463 vs. DRD (64.700). DRD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.97B vs. AUMBF (-5.91M). DRD has higher revenues than AUMBF: DRD (5.5B) vs AUMBF (5.94M).
AUMBFDRDAUMBF / DRD
Capitalization4.89M725M1%
EBITDA-5.91M1.97B-0%
Gain YTD68.46364.700106%
P/E RatioN/A10.62-
Revenue5.94M5.5B0%
Total Cash356KN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUMBF vs DRD: Fundamental Ratings
AUMBF
DRD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
416
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10084
SMR RATING
1..100
9519
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4045
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10049
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DRD's Valuation (13) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AUMBF (42) in the null industry. This means that DRD’s stock grew similarly to AUMBF’s over the last 12 months.

DRD's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AUMBF (100) in the null industry. This means that DRD’s stock grew similarly to AUMBF’s over the last 12 months.

DRD's SMR Rating (19) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for AUMBF (95) in the null industry. This means that DRD’s stock grew significantly faster than AUMBF’s over the last 12 months.

AUMBF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as DRD (45) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AUMBF’s stock grew similarly to DRD’s over the last 12 months.

DRD's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AUMBF (100) in the null industry. This means that DRD’s stock grew somewhat faster than AUMBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUMBFDRD
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AUMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DRD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WSCGX35.170.33
+0.95%
Allspring Small Company Growth Inst
GLCUX36.250.22
+0.61%
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts R6
POAGX47.890.07
+0.15%
PRIMECAP Odyssey Aggressive Growth
MAAOX2.39N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Dynamic Value C
MAIHX19.53-0.05
-0.26%
Morgan Stanley Inst Passport ovrs eq IR

AUMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AUMBF and SLVMF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AUMBF and SLVMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUMBF
1D Price
Change %
AUMBF100%
-3.79%
SLVMF - AUMBF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDVMF - AUMBF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.79%
DRD - AUMBF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
EGO - AUMBF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
IEGCF - AUMBF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DRD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DRD has been closely correlated with HMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DRD jumps, then HMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DRD
1D Price
Change %
DRD100%
-1.33%
HMY - DRD
78%
Closely correlated
-1.34%
GFI - DRD
76%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
AEM - DRD
75%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
AU - DRD
75%
Closely correlated
-0.71%
WPM - DRD
74%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
More