AUMBF
Price
$0.82
Change
+$0.09 (+12.33%)
Updated
Oct 6 closing price
Capitalization
211.71M
EDVMF
Price
$43.50
Change
+$1.00 (+2.35%)
Updated
Oct 6 closing price
Capitalization
10.35B
29 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AUMBF vs EDVMF

Header iconAUMBF vs EDVMF Comparison
Open Charts AUMBF vs EDVMFBanner chart's image
1911 Gold
Price$0.82
Change+$0.09 (+12.33%)
Volume$2.03M
Capitalization211.71M
ENDEAVOUR Mining
Price$43.50
Change+$1.00 (+2.35%)
Volume$13.66K
Capitalization10.35B
AUMBF vs EDVMF Comparison Chart in %
AUMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EDVMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUMBF vs. EDVMF commentary
Oct 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUMBF is a Buy and EDVMF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 08, 2025
Stock price -- (AUMBF: $0.83 vs. EDVMF: $42.33)
Brand notoriety: AUMBF and EDVMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUMBF: 150% vs. EDVMF: 94%
Market capitalization -- AUMBF: $211.71M vs. EDVMF: $10.35B
AUMBF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $211.71M. EDVMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $10.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $111.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUMBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEDVMF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AUMBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EDVMF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, EDVMF is a better buy in the long-term than AUMBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUMBF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EDVMF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AUMBF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • EDVMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EDVMF is a better buy in the short-term than AUMBF.

Price Growth

AUMBF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +25.12% price change this week, while EDVMF (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2313.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

EDVMF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.42% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EDVMF($10.3B) has a higher market cap than AUMBF($212M). AUMBF YTD gains are higher at: 703.152 vs. EDVMF (143.218). EDVMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.65B vs. AUMBF (-14.74M). EDVMF has more cash in the bank: 645M vs. AUMBF (1.35M). AUMBF has less debt than EDVMF: AUMBF (243K) vs EDVMF (1.18B). EDVMF has higher revenues than AUMBF: EDVMF (3.7B) vs AUMBF (0).
AUMBFEDVMFAUMBF / EDVMF
Capitalization212M10.3B2%
EBITDA-14.74M1.65B-1%
Gain YTD703.152143.218491%
P/E RatioN/A46.01-
Revenue03.7B-
Total Cash1.35M645M0%
Total Debt243K1.18B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUMBF vs EDVMF: Fundamental Ratings
AUMBF
EDVMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2834
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6521
SMR RATING
1..100
9777
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3438
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10017
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EDVMF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AUMBF (64). This means that EDVMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AUMBF’s over the last 12 months.

EDVMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AUMBF (65). This means that EDVMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AUMBF’s over the last 12 months.

EDVMF's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as AUMBF (97). This means that EDVMF’s stock grew similarly to AUMBF’s over the last 12 months.

AUMBF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as EDVMF (38). This means that AUMBF’s stock grew similarly to EDVMF’s over the last 12 months.

EDVMF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AUMBF (100). This means that EDVMF’s stock grew significantly faster than AUMBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUMBFEDVMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AUMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EDVMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PJBF64.17N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF
BBB31.74N/A
N/A
CYBER HORNET S&P500 Bitcoin 75/25StgyETF
AMZA39.65-0.05
-0.13%
InfraCap MLP ETF
SMAY25.38-0.13
-0.51%
FT Vest US Sm Cp Mod Buffr ETF- May
SECT63.31-0.43
-0.67%
Main Sector Rotation ETF

AUMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AUMBF and SLVMF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AUMBF and SLVMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUMBF
1D Price
Change %
AUMBF100%
+0.69%
SLVMF - AUMBF
31%
Poorly correlated
-5.08%
EDVMF - AUMBF
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.69%
DRD - AUMBF
26%
Poorly correlated
-3.39%
EGO - AUMBF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.61%
IEGCF - AUMBF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
More

EDVMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EDVMF has been loosely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EDVMF jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EDVMF
1D Price
Change %
EDVMF100%
-2.69%
AEM - EDVMF
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.42%
AGI - EDVMF
58%
Loosely correlated
-3.48%
PAAS - EDVMF
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.67%
RGLD - EDVMF
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.74%
WPM - EDVMF
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.36%
More