AUMBF
Price
$0.82
Change
+$0.09 (+12.33%)
Updated
Oct 6 closing price
Capitalization
211.71M
EGO
Price
$29.09
Change
-$0.78 (-2.61%)
Updated
Oct 7 closing price
Capitalization
5.91B
22 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AUMBF vs EGO

Header iconAUMBF vs EGO Comparison
Open Charts AUMBF vs EGOBanner chart's image
1911 Gold
Price$0.82
Change+$0.09 (+12.33%)
Volume$2.03M
Capitalization211.71M
Eldorado Gold
Price$29.09
Change-$0.78 (-2.61%)
Volume$1.81M
Capitalization5.91B
AUMBF vs EGO Comparison Chart in %
AUMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EGO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUMBF vs. EGO commentary
Oct 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUMBF is a Buy and EGO is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 08, 2025
Stock price -- (AUMBF: $0.83 vs. EGO: $29.09)
Brand notoriety: AUMBF and EGO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUMBF: 150% vs. EGO: 77%
Market capitalization -- AUMBF: $211.71M vs. EGO: $5.91B
AUMBF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $211.71M. EGO’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $111.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUMBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEGO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AUMBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EGO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EGO is a better buy in the long-term than AUMBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUMBF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EGO’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AUMBF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • EGO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AUMBF is a better buy in the short-term than EGO.

Price Growth

AUMBF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +25.12% price change this week, while EGO (@Precious Metals) price change was +0.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2313.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

EGO is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.42% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EGO($5.91B) has a higher market cap than AUMBF($212M). AUMBF YTD gains are higher at: 703.152 vs. EGO (95.629). EGO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 813M vs. AUMBF (-14.74M). EGO has more cash in the bank: 1.08B vs. AUMBF (1.35M). AUMBF has less debt than EGO: AUMBF (243K) vs EGO (1.17B). EGO has higher revenues than AUMBF: EGO (1.58B) vs AUMBF (0).
AUMBFEGOAUMBF / EGO
Capitalization212M5.91B4%
EBITDA-14.74M813M-2%
Gain YTD703.15295.629735%
P/E RatioN/A14.33-
Revenue01.58B-
Total Cash1.35M1.08B0%
Total Debt243K1.17B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUMBF vs EGO: Fundamental Ratings
AUMBF
EGO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2884
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6522
SMR RATING
1..100
9769
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3439
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10083
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AUMBF's Valuation (64) in the null industry is in the same range as EGO (89) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AUMBF’s stock grew similarly to EGO’s over the last 12 months.

EGO's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AUMBF (65) in the null industry. This means that EGO’s stock grew somewhat faster than AUMBF’s over the last 12 months.

EGO's SMR Rating (69) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AUMBF (97) in the null industry. This means that EGO’s stock grew similarly to AUMBF’s over the last 12 months.

AUMBF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as EGO (39) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AUMBF’s stock grew similarly to EGO’s over the last 12 months.

EGO's P/E Growth Rating (83) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AUMBF (100) in the null industry. This means that EGO’s stock grew similarly to AUMBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUMBFEGO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AUMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EGO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IEFCX25.73N/A
N/A
Invesco Energy C
SMMIX34.35N/A
N/A
Invesco Summit P
TSCPX12.47N/A
N/A
AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth N
WILIX23.39N/A
N/A
William Blair International Ldrs I
AMPCX36.86-0.15
-0.41%
American Funds AMCAP C

AUMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AUMBF and SLVMF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AUMBF and SLVMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUMBF
1D Price
Change %
AUMBF100%
+0.69%
SLVMF - AUMBF
31%
Poorly correlated
-5.08%
EDVMF - AUMBF
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.69%
DRD - AUMBF
26%
Poorly correlated
-3.39%
EGO - AUMBF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.61%
IEGCF - AUMBF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
More