AUMBF
Price
$0.21
Change
+$0.01 (+5.00%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
4.89M
SLVMF
Price
$0.11
Change
+$0.02 (+22.22%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
172.99M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AUMBF vs SLVMF

Header iconAUMBF vs SLVMF Comparison
Open Charts AUMBF vs SLVMFBanner chart's image
1911 Gold
Price$0.21
Change+$0.01 (+5.00%)
Volume$457.32K
Capitalization4.89M
Silver Mines Ltd., Sydney
Price$0.11
Change+$0.02 (+22.22%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization172.99M
AUMBF vs SLVMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AUMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLVMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUMBF vs. SLVMF commentary
Aug 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUMBF is a StrongBuy and SLVMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2025
Stock price -- (AUMBF: $0.21)
Brand notoriety:
Market capitalization --

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUMBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.

  • AUMBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUMBF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLVMF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AUMBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SLVMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLVMF is a better buy in the short-term than AUMBF.

Price Growth

AUMBF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +25.61% price change this weekfor the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.42% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLVMF($173M) has a higher market cap than AUMBF($4.89M). SLVMF YTD gains are higher at: 132.314 vs. AUMBF (101.848). AUMBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -5.91M vs. SLVMF (-7.48M). SLVMF has more cash in the bank: 12.1M vs. AUMBF (356K). AUMBF has higher revenues than SLVMF: AUMBF (5.94M) vs SLVMF (159K).
AUMBFSLVMFAUMBF / SLVMF
Capitalization4.89M173M3%
EBITDA-5.91M-7.48M79%
Gain YTD101.848132.31477%
P/E RatioN/A55.56-
Revenue5.94M159K3,738%
Total Cash356K12.1M3%
Total DebtN/A4.91M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUMBF: Fundamental Ratings
AUMBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
11
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUMBFSLVMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AUMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLVMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VHC16.071.07
+7.13%
VirnetX Holding Corp
TRP49.780.87
+1.78%
TC Energy Corp
RUSHA55.73-0.74
-1.31%
Rush Enterprises
TSQ6.78-0.14
-2.02%
Townsquare Media
ARR15.90-0.90
-5.36%
ARMOUR Residential REIT

AUMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AUMBF and SLVMF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AUMBF and SLVMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUMBF
1D Price
Change %
AUMBF100%
+5.06%
SLVMF - AUMBF
31%
Poorly correlated
+16.41%
EDVMF - AUMBF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
DRD - AUMBF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.91%
EGO - AUMBF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
IEGCF - AUMBF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.49%
More

SLVMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLVMF and SBMCF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLVMF and SBMCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLVMF
1D Price
Change %
SLVMF100%
+16.41%
SBMCF - SLVMF
30%
Poorly correlated
+9.92%
AUMBF - SLVMF
30%
Poorly correlated
+5.06%
LNCLF - SLVMF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRTIF - SLVMF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELRRF - SLVMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.99%
More