AUMBF
Price
$0.21
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
50.64M
SLVMF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.03 (-30.00%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
162.9M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AUMBF vs SLVMF

Header iconAUMBF vs SLVMF Comparison
Open Charts AUMBF vs SLVMFBanner chart's image
1911 Gold
Price$0.21
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$494.78K
Capitalization50.64M
Silver Mines Ltd., Sydney
Price$0.07
Change-$0.03 (-30.00%)
Volume$35K
Capitalization162.9M
AUMBF vs SLVMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AUMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLVMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUMBF vs. SLVMF commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUMBF is a StrongBuy and SLVMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (AUMBF: $0.21 vs. SLVMF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: AUMBF and SLVMF are both not notable
AUMBF represents the Precious Metals, while SLVMF is part of the Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUMBF: 135% vs. SLVMF: 131%
Market capitalization -- AUMBF: $50.64M vs. SLVMF: $162.9M
AUMBF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $50.64M. SLVMF’s [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] market capitalization is $162.9M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.82B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry ranges from $34.75B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.61B. The average market capitalization across the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry is $2.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUMBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLVMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AUMBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLVMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AUMBF and SLVMF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUMBF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLVMF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AUMBF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SLVMF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLVMF is a better buy in the short-term than AUMBF.

Price Growth

AUMBF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +14.25% price change this week, while SLVMF (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) price change was -17.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4166.53%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was +0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.99%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.80% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (+0.85% weekly)

The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLVMF($163M) has a higher market cap than AUMBF($50.6M). AUMBF YTD gains are higher at: 100.049 vs. SLVMF (53.057). SLVMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.44M vs. AUMBF (-12.99M). SLVMF has higher revenues than AUMBF: SLVMF (179K) vs AUMBF (0).
AUMBFSLVMFAUMBF / SLVMF
Capitalization50.6M163M31%
EBITDA-12.99M-3.44M378%
Gain YTD100.04953.057189%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0179K-
Total Cash4.04MN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUMBF: Fundamental Ratings
AUMBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
24
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUMBFSLVMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AUMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLVMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WMGRX24.980.13
+0.52%
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth R
MIQBX12.09N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst International Eq A
TLISX13.54N/A
N/A
Nuveen Quant Intl Small Cap Eq A
KGROX13.35N/A
N/A
Kennedy Capital Small Cap Growth Instl
GUSYX20.81N/A
N/A
Grandeur Peak US Stalwarts Institutional

AUMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AUMBF and SLVMF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AUMBF and SLVMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUMBF
1D Price
Change %
AUMBF100%
-1.03%
SLVMF - AUMBF
31%
Poorly correlated
-31.54%
EDVMF - AUMBF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
DRD - AUMBF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.74%
EGO - AUMBF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
IEGCF - AUMBF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
More

SLVMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLVMF and AUMBF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLVMF and AUMBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLVMF
1D Price
Change %
SLVMF100%
-31.54%
AUMBF - SLVMF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
LNCLF - SLVMF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELRRF - SLVMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.50%
HWAUF - SLVMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+5.23%
RDYFF - SLVMF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More