AUMC
Price
$0.63
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
NBMFF
Price
$0.48
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
28.25M
Ad is loading...

AUMC vs NBMFF

Header iconAUMC vs NBMFF Comparison
Open Charts AUMC vs NBMFFBanner chart's image
AURYN Mining
Price$0.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.92K
CapitalizationN/A
NEO Battery Materials
Price$0.48
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$41.1K
Capitalization28.25M
AUMC vs NBMFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUMC vs. NBMFF commentary
Apr 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUMC is a Hold and NBMFF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 06, 2025
Stock price -- (AUMC: $0.63 vs. NBMFF: $0.48)
Brand notoriety: AUMC and NBMFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUMC: 146% vs. NBMFF: 243%
Market capitalization -- AUMC: $0 vs. NBMFF: $28.25M
AUMC [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $0. NBMFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $28.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUMC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNBMFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AUMC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NBMFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AUMC and NBMFF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

AUMC (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -0.68% price change this week, while NBMFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -7.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -5.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-5.65% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBMFF YTD gains are higher at: -12.727 vs. AUMC (-18.182).
AUMCNBMFFAUMC / NBMFF
CapitalizationN/A28.2M-
EBITDAN/A-1.95M-
Gain YTD-18.182-12.727143%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A1.09M-
Total DebtN/A0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUMC vs NBMFF: Fundamental Ratings
AUMC
NBMFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2124
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10057
SMR RATING
1..100
10096
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4034
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
56100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AUMC's Valuation (85) in the null industry is in the same range as NBMFF (87). This means that AUMC’s stock grew similarly to NBMFF’s over the last 12 months.

NBMFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AUMC (100). This means that NBMFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AUMC’s over the last 12 months.

NBMFF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as AUMC (100). This means that NBMFF’s stock grew similarly to AUMC’s over the last 12 months.

NBMFF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as AUMC (40). This means that NBMFF’s stock grew similarly to AUMC’s over the last 12 months.

AUMC's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NBMFF (100). This means that AUMC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NBMFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CGVVX12.29N/A
N/A
Causeway Global Value Inv
LMPMX31.84N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Small Cap Growth 1
FIGSX17.55N/A
N/A
Fidelity Series International Growth
HAIDX12.45N/A
N/A
Harbor Diversified Intl All Cp Instl
PVCMX12.14N/A
N/A
Palm Valley Capital Investor

AUMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AUMC and PALAF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AUMC and PALAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUMC
1D Price
Change %
AUMC100%
+0.72%
PALAF - AUMC
31%
Poorly correlated
-8.87%
NBMFF - AUMC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AZMTF - AUMC
7%
Poorly correlated
-3.56%
AZZTF - AUMC
6%
Poorly correlated
-15.57%
BBBMF - AUMC
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NBMFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NBMFF and ASHXF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBMFF and ASHXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBMFF
1D Price
Change %
NBMFF100%
N/A
ASHXF - NBMFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VLTLF - NBMFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-6.00%
ECRAF - NBMFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.70%
AUMC - NBMFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
OMHLF - NBMFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More