Ad is loading...
AUSF vs COWZ
AUSF vs COWZ Comparison
Open Charts AUSF vs COWZ
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF
Price$40.40
Change-$1.07 (-2.58%)
Volume$74.23K
Net Assets454.84M
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Price$48.99
Change-$2.18 (-4.26%)
Volume$5.81M
Net Assets21.59B
AUSF vs COWZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AUSF vs. COWZ commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUSF is a Hold and COWZ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COWZ has more net assets: 21.6B vs. AUSF (455M). AUSF has a higher annual dividend yield than COWZ: AUSF (-3.171) vs COWZ (-12.902). AUSF was incepted earlier than COWZ: AUSF (7 years) vs COWZ (8 years). AUSF (0.27) has a lower expense ratio than COWZ (0.49). AUSF has a higher turnover COWZ (77.00) vs COWZ (77.00).
| AUSF | COWZ | AUSF / COWZ | |
| Gain YTD | -3.171 | -12.902 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 455M | 21.6B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.49 | 55% |
| Turnover | 95.79 | 77.00 | 124% |
| Yield | 2.78 | 1.85 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AUSF | COWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 81% | 26 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
AUSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AUSF has been closely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AUSF jumps, then L could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AUSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUSF | 100% | -2.58% | ||
| L - AUSF | 77% Closely correlated | -2.27% | ||
| TFC - AUSF | 77% Closely correlated | -6.19% | ||
| CADE - AUSF | 74% Closely correlated | -6.58% | ||
| COLB - AUSF | 73% Closely correlated | -6.75% | ||
| UMBF - AUSF | 72% Closely correlated | -6.57% | ||
More | ||||
COWZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWZ has been closely correlated with HAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWZ jumps, then HAL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | 100% | -4.26% | ||
| HAL - COWZ | 80% Closely correlated | -8.16% | ||
| CAT - COWZ | 78% Closely correlated | -3.94% | ||
| SLB - COWZ | 78% Closely correlated | -9.56% | ||
| FTV - COWZ | 77% Closely correlated | -5.89% | ||
| EMR - COWZ | 76% Closely correlated | -4.50% | ||
More | ||||