Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AUSF vs COWZ
AUSF vs COWZ Comparison
Open Charts AUSF vs COWZ
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF
Price$46.27
Change+$0.19 (+0.41%)
Volume$373
Net Assets701.48M
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Price$57.44
Change+$0.12 (+0.21%)
Volume$4.2K
Net Assets19.36B
AUSF vs COWZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AUSF vs. COWZ commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUSF is a Hold and COWZ is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COWZ has more net assets: 19.4B vs. AUSF (701M). AUSF has a higher annual dividend yield than COWZ: AUSF (11.938) vs COWZ (2.770). AUSF was incepted earlier than COWZ: AUSF (7 years) vs COWZ (9 years). AUSF (0.27) has a lower expense ratio than COWZ (0.49). COWZ has a higher turnover AUSF (95.79) vs AUSF (95.79).
| AUSF | COWZ | AUSF / COWZ | |
| Gain YTD | 11.938 | 2.770 | 431% |
| Net Assets | 701M | 19.4B | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.49 | 55% |
| Turnover | 95.79 | 151.00 | 63% |
| Yield | 2.80 | 1.51 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 9 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AUSF | COWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
AUSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AUSF has been closely correlated with PRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AUSF jumps, then PRU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AUSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUSF | 100% | +0.48% | ||
| PRU - AUSF | 82% Closely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| HBAN - AUSF | 80% Closely correlated | +1.53% | ||
| PNC - AUSF | 79% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| FITB - AUSF | 77% Closely correlated | +2.02% | ||
| RF - AUSF | 76% Closely correlated | +1.39% | ||
More | ||||
COWZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWZ has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWZ jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | 100% | +0.37% | ||
| FTV - COWZ | 79% Closely correlated | -1.48% | ||
| EMR - COWZ | 77% Closely correlated | +1.53% | ||
| CAT - COWZ | 76% Closely correlated | +2.27% | ||
| CMI - COWZ | 75% Closely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| SLB - COWZ | 74% Closely correlated | -1.28% | ||
More | ||||