Advertisement
AVBH vs FDBC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AVBH is a Hold and FDBC is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AVBH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFDBC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AVBH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- FDBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
AVBH (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.15% price change this week, while FDBC (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.68% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.99%.
Reported Earning Dates
AVBH is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.
FDBC is expected to report earnings on Mar 13, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+0.41% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| AVBH | FDBC | AVBH / FDBC | |
| Capitalization | 144M | 278M | 52% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.716 | -15.073 | 58% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.34 | 14.75 | 77% |
| Revenue | 40.6M | 72.7M | 56% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 28.4M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 134M | - |
AVBH | FDBC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 89 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 57 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 69 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 8 | 16 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | 86 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FDBC's Valuation (57) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AVBH (85) in the null industry. This means that FDBC’s stock grew similarly to AVBH’s over the last 12 months.
FDBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AVBH (70) in the null industry. This means that FDBC’s stock grew similarly to AVBH’s over the last 12 months.
AVBH's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as FDBC (16) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AVBH’s stock grew similarly to FDBC’s over the last 12 months.
FDBC's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AVBH (62) in the null industry. This means that FDBC’s stock grew similarly to AVBH’s over the last 12 months.
AVBH's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FDBC (86) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AVBH’s stock grew significantly faster than FDBC’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
Advertisement
AVBH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AVBH and MCB have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AVBH and MCB's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AVBH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVBH | 100% | N/A | ||
| MCB - AVBH | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.41% | ||
| JMSB - AVBH | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.69% | ||
| CBAN - AVBH | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.48% | ||
| SFST - AVBH | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.70% | ||
| FDBC - AVBH | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.25% | ||
More | ||||
FDBC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDBC has been closely correlated with NWFL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDBC jumps, then NWFL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDBC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDBC | 100% | -0.25% | ||
| NWFL - FDBC | 71% Closely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| WTBA - FDBC | 69% Closely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| FCBC - FDBC | 69% Closely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| PFIS - FDBC | 69% Closely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| FNLC - FDBC | 68% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
More | ||||