Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AWGIX vs FFAFX
AWGIX vs FFAFX Comparison
Open Charts AWGIX vs FFAFX
CIBC Atlas All Cap Growth Institutional
Price$40.26
Change-$0.26 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets334.62M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$85.67
Change-$0.60 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
AWGIX vs FFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. AWGIX (335M). AWGIX pays higher dividends than FFAFX: AWGIX (2.19) vs FFAFX (0.53). AWGIX was incepted earlier than FFAFX: AWGIX (18 years) vs FFAFX (5 years). AWGIX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). AWGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AWGIX: FFAFX (250) vs AWGIX (250000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.46 vs. AWGIX (-4.40). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.80 vs. AWGIX (15.75).
| AWGIX | FFAFX | AWGIX / FFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.35 | 263% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.35 | 263% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.714 | 15.458 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 335M | 327B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.19 | 0.53 | 410% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.40 | 7.46 | -59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.53 | 63.91 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.75 | 35.80 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.77 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement