AWLNF
Price
$0.32
Change
-$0.06 (-15.79%)
Updated
Feb 7 closing price
Capitalization
45.48M
MRPMF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
190.64M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AWLNF vs MRPMF

Header iconAWLNF vs MRPMF Comparison
Open Charts AWLNF vs MRPMFBanner chart's image
AWILCO LNG AS
Price$0.32
Change-$0.06 (-15.79%)
Volume$100
Capitalization45.48M
MARCO POLO MARINE
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization190.64M
AWLNF vs MRPMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MRPMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AWLNF vs. MRPMF commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWLNF is a Hold and MRPMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (AWLNF: $0.32 vs. MRPMF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: AWLNF and MRPMF are both not notable
AWLNF represents the Oil & Gas Pipelines, while MRPMF is part of the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AWLNF: 100% vs. MRPMF: 6%
Market capitalization -- AWLNF: $45.48M vs. MRPMF: $190.64M
AWLNF [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $45.48M. MRPMF’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $190.64M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $103.07B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $33.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $12.01B. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AWLNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMRPMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AWLNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MRPMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MRPMF is a better buy in the long-term than AWLNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MRPMF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MRPMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

AWLNF (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MRPMF (@Marine Shipping) price change was +49.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -2.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.37%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (-2.84% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

@Marine Shipping (+1.00% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MRPMF($191M) has a higher market cap than AWLNF($45.5M). MRPMF has higher P/E ratio than AWLNF: MRPMF (8.76) vs AWLNF (2.47). MRPMF YTD gains are higher at: 4.935 vs. AWLNF (-18.226). AWLNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 39.8M vs. MRPMF (37.2M). MRPMF has more cash in the bank: 45.6M vs. AWLNF (22.9M). MRPMF has less debt than AWLNF: MRPMF (34.6M) vs AWLNF (188M). MRPMF has higher revenues than AWLNF: MRPMF (115M) vs AWLNF (55.6M).
AWLNFMRPMFAWLNF / MRPMF
Capitalization45.5M191M24%
EBITDA39.8M37.2M107%
Gain YTD-18.2264.935-369%
P/E Ratio2.478.7628%
Revenue55.6M115M48%
Total Cash22.9M45.6M50%
Total Debt188M34.6M543%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AWLNFMRPMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
2%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
3%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MRPMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NEEGX58.48N/A
N/A
Needham Growth Retail
IWTTX12.30N/A
N/A
Voya Global High Dividend Low Vol PortS2
FLIAX10.65N/A
N/A
First Sentier American Listed Infras Ins
FBTCX22.95N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology C
OLVCX19.88N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Large Cap Value C

AWLNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AWLNF has been loosely correlated with WSSTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AWLNF jumps, then WSSTF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AWLNF
1D Price
Change %
AWLNF100%
N/A
WSSTF - AWLNF
57%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MRPMF - AWLNF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DMCOF - AWLNF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WAWIF - AWLNF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-3.54%
SITIF - AWLNF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MRPMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MRPMF and HSHP have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MRPMF and HSHP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRPMF
1D Price
Change %
MRPMF100%
N/A
HSHP - MRPMF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
TORO - MRPMF
7%
Poorly correlated
+4.83%
TTBKF - MRPMF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WSSTF - MRPMF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AWLNF - MRPMF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More