Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AWPAX vs RERBX
AWPAX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts AWPAX vs RERBX
AB Sustainable Intl Thematic A
Price$20.54
Change-$0.10 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets873.26M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$60.12
Change-$0.82 (-1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.2B
AWPAX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AWPAX vs. RERBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWPAX is a Hold and RERBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. AWPAX (873M). RERBX pays higher dividends than AWPAX: RERBX (0.23) vs AWPAX (0.00). AWPAX was incepted earlier than RERBX: AWPAX (31 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than AWPAX (1.05). AWPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RERBX (35.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than AWPAX: RERBX (250) vs AWPAX (2500). RERBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.15 vs. AWPAX (7.33). RERBX return over 5 years is better than : 0.64 vs. AWPAX (-4.80).
| AWPAX | RERBX | AWPAX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.56 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.56 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.438 | 18.230 | 52% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 873M | 134B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.33 | 12.15 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.91 | 28.83 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.80 | 0.64 | -755% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.04 | 32.65 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement