Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AWPAX vs RERBX
AWPAX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts AWPAX vs RERBX
AB Sustainable Intl Thematic A
Price$21.09
Change-$0.05 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets893.32M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$61.31
Change-$0.26 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.72B
AWPAX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AWPAX vs. RERBX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWPAX is a Hold and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. AWPAX (893M). RERBX pays higher dividends than AWPAX: RERBX (0.24) vs AWPAX (0.00). AWPAX was incepted earlier than RERBX: AWPAX (31 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than AWPAX (1.05). AWPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RERBX (35.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than AWPAX: RERBX (250) vs AWPAX (2500). RERBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.38 vs. AWPAX (2.82). RERBX return over 5 years is better than : 10.03 vs. AWPAX (1.15).
| AWPAX | RERBX | AWPAX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.56 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.56 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.089 | 21.082 | 57% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 893M | 138B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.24 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.82 | 10.38 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.08 | 46.08 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.15 | 10.03 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.04 | 36.41 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement