Ad is loading...
AWPAX vs RERBX
AWPAX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts AWPAX vs RERBX
AB Sustainable Intl Thematic A
Price$18.39
Change+$0.44 (+2.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets804.52M
American Funds Europacific Growth R2
Price$49.81
Change+$0.84 (+1.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets116.48B
AWPAX vs RERBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AWPAX vs. RERBX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWPAX is a Hold and RERBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 116B vs. AWPAX (805M). RERBX pays higher dividends than AWPAX: RERBX (0.48) vs AWPAX (0.00). AWPAX was incepted earlier than RERBX: AWPAX (31 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than AWPAX (1.05). AWPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RERBX (30.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than AWPAX: RERBX (250) vs AWPAX (2500). AWPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.42 vs. RERBX (-9.41). AWPAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.19 vs. RERBX (17.49).
| AWPAX | RERBX | AWPAX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.56 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.56 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.825 | -2.045 | 236% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 805M | 116B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.42 | -9.41 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.72 | -3.26 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.19 | 17.49 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.40 | 1.92 | 177% |