Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AWPCX vs RERBX
AWPCX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts AWPCX vs RERBX
AB Sustainable Intl Thematic C
Price$17.22
Change+$0.05 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets907.62M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$58.70
Change+$0.33 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.22B
AWPCX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AWPCX vs. RERBX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWPCX is a Buy and RERBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. AWPCX (908M). RERBX pays higher dividends than AWPCX: RERBX (0.25) vs AWPCX (0.00). AWPCX was incepted earlier than RERBX: AWPCX (31 years) vs RERBX (23 years). AWPCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than RERBX (1.56). AWPCX (36.00) and RERBX (35.00) have comparable annual turnover. RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than AWPCX: RERBX (250) vs AWPCX (2500). RERBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.07 vs. AWPCX (5.00). RERBX return over 5 years is better than : 8.46 vs. AWPCX (4.05).
| AWPCX | RERBX | AWPCX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 1.56 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.56 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.475 | 15.438 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 908M | 135B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.25 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.00 | 7.07 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.42 | 21.86 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.05 | 8.46 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.62 | 25.90 | 68% |