Ad is loading...
AWPCX vs RERBX
AWPCX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts AWPCX vs RERBX
AB Sustainable Intl Thematic C
Price$16.21
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets890.11M
American Funds Europacific Growth R2
Price$54.74
Change+$0.12 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets129.02B
AWPCX vs RERBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AWPCX vs. RERBX commentary
May 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWPCX is a Buy and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 129B vs. AWPCX (890M). RERBX pays higher dividends than AWPCX: RERBX (0.47) vs AWPCX (0.00). AWPCX was incepted earlier than RERBX: AWPCX (30 years) vs RERBX (23 years). AWPCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than RERBX (1.56). AWPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RERBX (30.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than AWPCX: RERBX (250) vs AWPCX (2500). AWPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.44 vs. RERBX (0.05). RERBX return over 5 years is better than : 25.82 vs. AWPCX (20.73).
| AWPCX | RERBX | AWPCX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 1.56 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.56 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.748 | 7.650 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 890M | 129B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.44 | 0.05 | 13,005% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.66 | 14.79 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.73 | 25.82 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.25 | 12.09 | 27% |