Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AWPYX vs RERBX
AWPYX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts AWPYX vs RERBX
AB Sustainable Intl Thematic Advisor
Price$21.41
Change-$0.06 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets868.73M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$59.87
Change-$0.25 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.22B
AWPYX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AWPYX vs. RERBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWPYX is a Hold and RERBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 132B vs. AWPYX (869M). RERBX pays higher dividends than AWPYX: RERBX (0.23) vs AWPYX (0.00). AWPYX was incepted earlier than RERBX: AWPYX (29 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than AWPYX (0.80). AWPYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RERBX (35.00). AWPYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERBX: AWPYX (0) vs RERBX (250). RERBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.81 vs. AWPYX (6.98). RERBX return over 5 years is better than : -0.24 vs. AWPYX (-4.15).
| AWPYX | RERBX | AWPYX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.56 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.56 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.151 | 17.738 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 869M | 132B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.98 | 11.81 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.23 | 28.30 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.15 | -0.24 | 1,736% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.07 | 32.10 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement