Advertisement
AWR vs WOR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWR is a Hold and WOR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AWR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWOR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- AWR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- WOR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AWR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WOR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AWR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- WOR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AWR (@Water Utilities) experienced а -1.51% price change this week, while WOR (@Metal Fabrication) price change was -3.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Water Utilities industry was -0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.96%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was -1.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.81%.
Reported Earning Dates
AWR is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.
WOR is expected to report earnings on Sep 24, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Water Utilities (-0.46% weekly)Water utilities operate water treatment plants, and/or distribute water to residential and commercial customers. Companies operating in this industry are largely responsible for the safe and timely distribution of water. While most water systems are local or regional, some of the companies might have operations across several states. The industry is expected to be closely monitored by regulators for quality checks on the water being distributed. Investing in upgrading infrastructure is a major factor in bolstering the supply of clean/safe-to-use water. Given the absolute necessity of water in our lives, the industry is largely non-cyclical. American Water Works Company, Inc., Aqua America, Inc., American States Water Co. and California Water Service Group are some of the major water utilities companies in the U.S.
@Metal Fabrication (-1.08% weekly)The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.
| AWR | WOR | AWR / WOR | |
| Capitalization | 2.65B | 2.95B | 90% |
| EBITDA | 253M | 144M | 176% |
| Gain YTD | 0.560 | 48.315 | 1% |
| P/E Ratio | 21.33 | 48.82 | 44% |
| Revenue | 596M | 1.16B | 52% |
| Total Cash | 14.1M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 918M | 316M | 291% |
AWR | WOR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 81 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | 38 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 57 | 80 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 11 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WOR's Valuation (38) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AWR (88) in the Water Utilities industry. This means that WOR’s stock grew somewhat faster than AWR’s over the last 12 months.
WOR's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AWR (80) in the Water Utilities industry. This means that WOR’s stock grew somewhat faster than AWR’s over the last 12 months.
AWR's SMR Rating (57) in the Water Utilities industry is in the same range as WOR (80) in the Steel industry. This means that AWR’s stock grew similarly to WOR’s over the last 12 months.
WOR's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Steel industry is in the same range as AWR (52) in the Water Utilities industry. This means that WOR’s stock grew similarly to AWR’s over the last 12 months.
WOR's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AWR (50) in the Water Utilities industry. This means that WOR’s stock grew somewhat faster than AWR’s over the last 12 months.
| AWR | WOR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 53% | 8 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 5 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 70% |
Advertisement
AWR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AWR has been closely correlated with CWT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AWR jumps, then CWT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AWR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AWR | 100% | -1.19% | ||
| CWT - AWR | 84% Closely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| WTRG - AWR | 80% Closely correlated | -1.76% | ||
| HTO - AWR | 80% Closely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| YORW - AWR | 75% Closely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| AWK - AWR | 74% Closely correlated | -0.69% | ||
More | ||||
WOR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WOR has been loosely correlated with MLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WOR jumps, then MLI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WOR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WOR | 100% | -1.12% | ||
| MLI - WOR | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.94% | ||
| STLD - WOR | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| MTUS - WOR | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| CMC - WOR | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| RYI - WOR | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.98% | ||
More | ||||