Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AWTCX vs FSDPX
AWTCX vs FSDPX Comparison
Open Charts AWTCX vs FSDPX
Virtus Duff & Phelps Water C
Price$20.03
Change-$0.08 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets586.2M
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$91.56
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets712.41M
AWTCX vs FSDPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AWTCX vs. FSDPX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWTCX is a Buy and FSDPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 712M vs. AWTCX (586M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than AWTCX: FSDPX (0.93) vs AWTCX (0.00). AWTCX was incepted earlier than FSDPX: AWTCX (17 years) vs FSDPX (39 years). AWTCX (2.24) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). FSDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. AWTCX (22.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than AWTCX: FSDPX (0) vs AWTCX (2500). AWTCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.69 vs. FSDPX (-3.47). FSDPX return over 5 years is better than : 36.47 vs. AWTCX (20.77).
| AWTCX | FSDPX | AWTCX / FSDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.70 | 281% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 0.70 | 320% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.002 | 9.020 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 586M | 712M | 82% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.93 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.69 | -3.47 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.78 | -5.46 | -216% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.77 | 36.47 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.14 | 26.50 | 238% |