Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AWTCX vs FSDPX
AWTCX vs FSDPX Comparison
Open Charts AWTCX vs FSDPX
Virtus Duff & Phelps Water C
Price$19.73
Change+$0.06 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets577.17M
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$92.70
Change+$0.02 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets729.08M
AWTCX vs FSDPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AWTCX vs. FSDPX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWTCX is a StrongBuy and FSDPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 729M vs. AWTCX (577M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than AWTCX: FSDPX (0.92) vs AWTCX (0.00). AWTCX was incepted earlier than FSDPX: AWTCX (17 years) vs FSDPX (39 years). AWTCX (2.24) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). FSDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. AWTCX (22.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than AWTCX: FSDPX (0) vs AWTCX (2500). AWTCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.45 vs. FSDPX (-3.53). FSDPX return over 5 years is better than : 51.01 vs. AWTCX (28.59).
| AWTCX | FSDPX | AWTCX / FSDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.70 | 281% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 0.70 | 320% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.508 | 10.281 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 577M | 729M | 79% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.92 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.45 | -3.53 | -69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.29 | 6.95 | 364% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.59 | 51.01 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.13 | 26.05 | 235% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement