Ad is loading...
AWTCX vs FSDPX
AWTCX vs FSDPX Comparison
Open Charts AWTCX vs FSDPX
Virtus Duff & Phelps Water C
Price$17.25
Change+$0.89 (+5.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets493.79M
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$80.86
Change+$6.35 (+8.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets721.19M
AWTCX vs FSDPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AWTCX vs. FSDPX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWTCX is a Hold and FSDPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 721M vs. AWTCX (494M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than AWTCX: FSDPX (1.05) vs AWTCX (0.00). AWTCX was incepted earlier than FSDPX: AWTCX (17 years) vs FSDPX (39 years). AWTCX (2.24) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.71). FSDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. AWTCX (22.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than AWTCX: FSDPX (0) vs AWTCX (2500). AWTCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.68 vs. FSDPX (-27.11). FSDPX return over 5 years is better than : 40.67 vs. AWTCX (15.29).
| AWTCX | FSDPX | AWTCX / FSDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.71 | 277% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 0.71 | 315% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.406 | -9.079 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 494M | 721M | 69% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.05 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.68 | -27.11 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.76 | -27.71 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.29 | 40.67 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.97 | 1.52 | 2,039% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...