Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AWTCX vs FSDPX
AWTCX vs FSDPX Comparison
Open Charts AWTCX vs FSDPX
Virtus Duff & Phelps Water C
Price$19.44
Change-$0.14 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets561.03M
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$91.74
Change-$1.03 (-1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets743.4M
AWTCX vs FSDPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AWTCX vs. FSDPX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWTCX is a Hold and FSDPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 743M vs. AWTCX (561M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than AWTCX: FSDPX (0.88) vs AWTCX (0.00). AWTCX was incepted earlier than FSDPX: AWTCX (18 years) vs FSDPX (39 years). AWTCX (2.24) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). FSDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. AWTCX (22.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than AWTCX: FSDPX (0) vs AWTCX (2500). AWTCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.86 vs. FSDPX (-7.05). FSDPX return over 5 years is better than : 41.58 vs. AWTCX (20.10).
| AWTCX | FSDPX | AWTCX / FSDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.70 | 281% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 0.70 | 320% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.998 | 10.388 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 561M | 743M | 76% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.88 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.86 | -7.05 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.27 | 14.67 | 206% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.10 | 41.58 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.05 | 50.99 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement