AX
Price
$68.86
Change
-$0.16 (-0.23%)
Updated
May 9, 02:15 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.98B
88 days until earnings call
FNWB
Price
$9.91
Change
-$0.05 (-0.50%)
Updated
May 9, 01:22 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
149.01M
75 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AX vs FNWB

Header iconAX vs FNWB Comparison
Open Charts AX vs FNWBBanner chart's image
Axos Financial
Price$68.86
Change-$0.16 (-0.23%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.98B
First Northwest Ban
Price$9.91
Change-$0.05 (-0.50%)
Volume$100
Capitalization149.01M
AX vs FNWB Comparison Chart
Loading...
AX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AX vs. FNWB commentary
May 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AX is a StrongBuy and FNWB is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 09, 2025
Stock price -- (AX: $69.02 vs. FNWB: $9.96)
Brand notoriety: AX and FNWB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AX: 81% vs. FNWB: 49%
Market capitalization -- AX: $2.98B vs. FNWB: $149.01M
AX [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.98B. FNWB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $149.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AX’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFNWB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FNWB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AX is a better buy in the long-term than FNWB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AX’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNWB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AX’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FNWB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AX is a better buy in the short-term than FNWB.

Price Growth

AX (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.37% price change this week, while FNWB (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

AX is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

FNWB is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AX($2.98B) has a higher market cap than FNWB($149M). FNWB has higher P/E ratio than AX: FNWB (60.69) vs AX (7.78). AX YTD gains are higher at: -1.188 vs. FNWB (-1.773). FNWB has less debt than AX: FNWB (321M) vs AX (431M). AX has higher revenues than FNWB: AX (1.05B) vs FNWB (65.5M).
AXFNWBAX / FNWB
Capitalization2.98B149M2,002%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.188-1.77367%
P/E Ratio7.7860.6913%
Revenue1.05B65.5M1,602%
Total CashN/A20.6M-
Total Debt431M321M134%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AX vs FNWB: Fundamental Ratings
AX
FNWB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2254
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
22100
SMR RATING
1..100
821
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4976
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
342
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a37

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AX's Valuation (78) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FNWB (83). This means that AX’s stock grew similarly to FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

AX's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNWB (100). This means that AX’s stock grew significantly faster than FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

AX's SMR Rating (8) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FNWB (21). This means that AX’s stock grew similarly to FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

AX's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FNWB (76). This means that AX’s stock grew similarly to FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

FNWB's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as AX (34). This means that FNWB’s stock grew similarly to AX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AXFNWB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYAEX112.29N/A
N/A
Rydex Europe 1.25x Strategy A
AFCNX17.67N/A
N/A
American Century Focused Intl Gr Inv
FEYIX26.48N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% I
IUAAX40.11N/A
N/A
VY® Invesco Equity and Income A
SMLPX10.08N/A
N/A
Westwood Salient MLP & Engy Infras Inst

FNWB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNWB has been loosely correlated with OZKAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNWB jumps, then OZKAP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNWB
1D Price
Change %
FNWB100%
+2.21%
OZKAP - FNWB
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
OCFCP - FNWB
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
WTFCP - FNWB
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
AX - FNWB
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.86%
INDB - FNWB
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.97%
More