Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AXMNX vs FSMAX
AXMNX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts AXMNX vs FSMAX
Acclivity Mid Cap Multi-Style N
Price$15.79
Change+$0.11 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.15M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$96.51
Change+$0.65 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.17B
AXMNX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AXMNX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AXMNX is a StrongBuy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.2B vs. AXMNX (4.15M). AXMNX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: AXMNX (0.82) vs FSMAX (0.47). AXMNX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: AXMNX (6 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). AXMNX (5.17) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). AXMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AXMNX: FSMAX (0) vs AXMNX (5000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.55 vs. AXMNX (6.55). AXMNX return over 5 years is better than : 84.36 vs. FSMAX (60.82).
| AXMNX | FSMAX | AXMNX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.04 | 1,971% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 5.17 | 0.04 | 14,771% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.294 | 5.480 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.15M | 39.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.47 | 172% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.55 | 14.55 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.42 | 50.71 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 84.36 | 60.82 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 84.87 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement