Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AXMNX vs FSMAX
AXMNX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts AXMNX vs FSMAX
Acclivity Mid Cap Multi-Style N
Price$14.70
Change-$0.03 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.93M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$87.12
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.02B
AXMNX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AXMNX vs. FSMAX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AXMNX is a StrongBuy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36B vs. AXMNX (3.93M). AXMNX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: AXMNX (0.89) vs FSMAX (0.54). AXMNX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: AXMNX (5 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). AXMNX (5.17) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). AXMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AXMNX: FSMAX (0) vs AXMNX (5000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.44 vs. AXMNX (1.19). AXMNX return over 5 years is better than : 92.07 vs. FSMAX (63.33).
| AXMNX | FSMAX | AXMNX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.04 | 1,971% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 5.17 | 0.04 | 14,771% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.964 | -4.357 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.93M | 36B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 0.54 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.19 | 6.44 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.23 | 35.01 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 92.07 | 63.33 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 62.99 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers