Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AXMNX vs FSMAX
AXMNX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts AXMNX vs FSMAX
Acclivity Mid Cap Multi-Style N
Price$16.06
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.39M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$101.24
Change+$0.23 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05B
AXMNX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AXMNX vs. FSMAX commentary
Oct 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AXMNX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. AXMNX (4.39M). AXMNX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: AXMNX (0.78) vs FSMAX (0.44). AXMNX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: AXMNX (6 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). AXMNX (5.17) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). AXMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AXMNX: FSMAX (0) vs AXMNX (5000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.56 vs. AXMNX (2.76). AXMNX return over 5 years is better than : 84.83 vs. FSMAX (60.30).
| AXMNX | FSMAX | AXMNX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.04 | 1,971% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 5.17 | 0.04 | 14,771% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.665 | 11.147 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.39M | 41B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 0.44 | 175% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.76 | 16.56 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.38 | 71.30 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 84.83 | 60.30 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 111.48 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement