Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AXMNX vs FSMDX
AXMNX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts AXMNX vs FSMDX
Acclivity Mid Cap Multi-Style N
Price$16.06
Change+$0.14 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.36M
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.90
Change+$0.34 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.83B
AXMNX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AXMNX vs. FSMDX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AXMNX is a StrongBuy and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 44.8B vs. AXMNX (4.36M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than AXMNX: FSMDX (1.26) vs AXMNX (0.78). AXMNX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: AXMNX (6 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). AXMNX (5.17) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). AXMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than AXMNX: FSMDX (0) vs AXMNX (5000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.47 vs. AXMNX (7.83). AXMNX return over 5 years is better than : 82.92 vs. FSMDX (71.01).
| AXMNX | FSMDX | AXMNX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.03 | 2,760% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 5.17 | 0.03 | 20,680% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.731 | 9.771 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.36M | 44.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 1.26 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.83 | 14.47 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.64 | 47.43 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.92 | 71.01 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 140.48 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement