Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AXMNX vs FSMDX
AXMNX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts AXMNX vs FSMDX
Acclivity Mid Cap Multi-Style N
Price$14.70
Change-$0.03 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.93M
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$33.76
Change-$0.05 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.69B
AXMNX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AXMNX vs. FSMDX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AXMNX is a StrongBuy and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 37.7B vs. AXMNX (3.93M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than AXMNX: FSMDX (1.21) vs AXMNX (0.89). AXMNX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: AXMNX (5 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). AXMNX (5.17) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). AXMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than AXMNX: FSMDX (0) vs AXMNX (5000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.86 vs. AXMNX (1.19). AXMNX return over 5 years is better than : 92.07 vs. FSMDX (78.84).
| AXMNX | FSMDX | AXMNX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.03 | 2,760% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 5.17 | 0.03 | 20,680% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.964 | 0.118 | -2,503% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.93M | 37.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 1.21 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.19 | 6.86 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.23 | 31.52 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 92.07 | 78.84 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 102.29 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers