Advertisement
AXS vs LMND
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AXS is a Hold and LMND is a Hold.
| AXS | LMND | AXS / LMND | |
| Capitalization | 7.3B | 3.76B | 194% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.583 | -33.844 | 19% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.12 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 6.85B | 975M | 703% |
| Total Cash | 6.09B | 560M | 1,087% |
| Total Debt | 1.49B | 226M | 658% |
AXS | LMND | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 87 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 68 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 73 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 68 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 14 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AXS's Valuation (28) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LMND (87) in the null industry. This means that AXS’s stock grew somewhat faster than LMND’s over the last 12 months.
AXS's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for LMND (100) in the null industry. This means that AXS’s stock grew significantly faster than LMND’s over the last 12 months.
AXS's SMR Rating (68) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as LMND (100) in the null industry. This means that AXS’s stock grew similarly to LMND’s over the last 12 months.
AXS's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as LMND (73) in the null industry. This means that AXS’s stock grew similarly to LMND’s over the last 12 months.
AXS's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as LMND (100) in the null industry. This means that AXS’s stock grew similarly to LMND’s over the last 12 months.
| AXS | LMND | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 45% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 41% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 63% | 17 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 47% | 4 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 37% | 1 day ago 86% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AXS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while LMND’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AXS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- LMND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AXS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LMND’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AXS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- LMND’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
AXS (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а +0.98% price change this week, while LMND (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -4.68% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was -2.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.73%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.63%.
Reported Earning Dates
AXS is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
LMND is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Insurance (-2.84% weekly)Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.
@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.68% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NBIL | 24.00 | 1.09 | +4.76% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIL) | |||
| GEVG | 21.40 | 0.62 | +2.99% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long GEV Daily ETF | |||
| MCHI | 53.07 | 0.40 | +0.76% |
| iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) | |||
| BBIB | 95.12 | N/A | N/A |
| JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) | |||
| FMAT | 56.89 | -0.89 | -1.54% |
| Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT) | |||
AXS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AXS has been closely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AXS jumps, then L could also see price increases.
LMND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LMND has been loosely correlated with HIPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LMND jumps, then HIPO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LMND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMND | 100% | -3.07% | ||
| HIPO - LMND | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| BNT - LMND | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| HIG - LMND | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.94% | ||
| AXS - LMND | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.78% | ||
| UFCS - LMND | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.17% | ||
More | ||||