AXS
Price
$95.95
Change
+$0.67 (+0.70%)
Updated
Aug 7, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.49B
82 days until earnings call
SIGIP
Price
$17.30
Change
-$0.09 (-0.52%)
Updated
Aug 7, 02:45 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

AXS vs SIGIP

Header iconAXS vs SIGIP Comparison
Open Charts AXS vs SIGIPBanner chart's image
Axis Capital Holders
Price$95.95
Change+$0.67 (+0.70%)
Volume$6.78K
Capitalization5.49B
Selective Insurance Group
Price$17.30
Change-$0.09 (-0.52%)
Volume$238
CapitalizationN/A
AXS vs SIGIP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AXS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SIGIP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AXS vs. SIGIP commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AXS is a StrongBuy and SIGIP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (AXS: $95.90 vs. SIGIP: $17.39)
Brand notoriety: AXS and SIGIP are both not notable
AXS represents the Specialty Insurance, while SIGIP is part of the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AXS: 116% vs. SIGIP: 23%
Market capitalization -- AXS: $5.49B vs. SIGIP: $0
AXS [@Specialty Insurance] is valued at $5.49B. SIGIP’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Insurance] industry ranges from $14.46B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Insurance] industry is $3.23B. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AXS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSIGIP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AXS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SIGIP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AXS is a better buy in the long-term than SIGIP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AXS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SIGIP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AXS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SIGIP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SIGIP is a better buy in the short-term than AXS.

Price Growth

AXS (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а +2.20% price change this week, while SIGIP (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +2.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was +2.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.43%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

AXS is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Insurance (+2.63% weekly)

Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.11% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AXS YTD gains are higher at: 9.161 vs. SIGIP (3.767). AXS has more cash in the bank: 5.31B vs. SIGIP (821M). SIGIP has less debt than AXS: SIGIP (504M) vs AXS (1.52B). AXS has higher revenues than SIGIP: AXS (5.59B) vs SIGIP (4.23B).
AXSSIGIPAXS / SIGIP
Capitalization5.49BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.1613.767243%
P/E Ratio16.17N/A-
Revenue5.59B4.23B132%
Total Cash5.31B821M646%
Total Debt1.52B504M302%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AXS: Fundamental Ratings
AXS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
12
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3
SMR RATING
1..100
75
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
17

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AXSSIGIP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
31%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AXS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SIGIP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VLACX118.05N/A
N/A
Vanguard Large Cap Index Investor
PBQAX24.96N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Blend A
PPSRX19.92N/A
N/A
Principal Large Cap Value III R5
LRSTX20.13N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R5
ASCFX23.75N/A
N/A
Virtus Small-Cap R6

SIGIP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SIGIP and LMND have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SIGIP and LMND's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SIGIP
1D Price
Change %
SIGIP100%
N/A
LMND - SIGIP
29%
Poorly correlated
+6.55%
MCY - SIGIP
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.26%
AXS - SIGIP
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
PRA - SIGIP
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
SIGI - SIGIP
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.31%
More