AXTA
Price
$34.19
Change
+$0.05 (+0.15%)
Updated
Oct 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.31B
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FUL
Price
$49.15
Change
-$0.46 (-0.93%)
Updated
Oct 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.67B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AXTA vs FUL

AXTA vs FUL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AXTA vs. FUL commentary
Oct 27, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AXTA is a Buy and FUL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for AXTA with price predictions
Oct 23, 2026

AXTA's MACD Histogram just turned positive

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for AXTA turned positive on October 05, 2026. Looking at past instances where AXTA's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 33 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where AXTA's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 12 of 22 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 55%.

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 12, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on AXTA as a result. In 52 of 86 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 60%.

Following a +3.85% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where AXTA advanced for three days, in 211 of 325 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 8 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.

AXTA moved below its 50-day moving average on October 23, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where AXTA declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 59%.

AXTA broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 21, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

The Aroon Indicator for AXTA entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 9 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 44 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. AXTA’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 58 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 66 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.897) is normal, around the industry mean (2.372). P/E Ratio (20.945) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-17.543). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.090) is also within normal values, averaging (1.548). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.040) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.389) is also within normal values, averaging (48.960).

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 82 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. AXTA’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 82, placing this stock worse than average.

The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for FUL with price predictions
Oct 23, 2026

Momentum Indicator for FUL turns positive, indicating new upward trend

FUL saw its Momentum Indicator move above the 0 level on October 13, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new upward move. Traders may want to consider buying the stock or buying call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 83 similar instances where the indicator turned positive. In 54 of the 83 cases, the stock moved higher in the following days. The odds of a move higher are at 65%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where FUL's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 16 of 27 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 59%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for FUL just turned positive on September 25, 2026. Looking at past instances where FUL's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 26 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 58%.

Following a +0.63% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FUL advanced for three days, in 153 of 283 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 54%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 32 of 57 cases where FUL's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 56%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FUL declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 61%.

FUL broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

The Aroon Indicator for FUL entered a downward trend on October 05, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 61 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.282) is normal, around the industry mean (2.372). P/E Ratio (14.591) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-17.543). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.840) is also within normal values, averaging (1.548). Dividend Yield (0.020) settles around the average of (0.040) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.801) is also within normal values, averaging (48.960).

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 71 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. FUL’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 73 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly better than average sales and a considerably profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 89 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. FUL’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 82, placing this stock worse than average.

FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AXTA vs FUL: Fundamental Ratings
AXTA
FUL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
82100
SMR RATING
1..100
5873
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4471
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
989
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUL's Valuation (61) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as AXTA (66). This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to AXTA’s over the last 12 months.

AXTA's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as FUL (100). This means that AXTA’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.

AXTA's SMR Rating (58) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as FUL (73). This means that AXTA’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.

AXTA's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as FUL (71). This means that AXTA’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.

AXTA's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Industrial Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for FUL (89). This means that AXTA’s stock grew significantly faster than FUL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AXTAFUL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 27, 2026
Stock price -- (AXTA: $34.17 vs. FUL: $49.13)
Brand notoriety: AXTA and FUL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AXTA: 88% vs. FUL: 54%
Market capitalization -- AXTA: $7.31B vs. FUL: $2.67B
AXTA [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $7.31B. FUL’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $2.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $50 to $233.98B. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $11.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AXTA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while FUL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AXTA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FUL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AXTA is a better buy in the long-term than FUL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AXTA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FUL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AXTA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FUL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FUL is a better buy in the short-term than AXTA.

Price Growth

AXTA (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +1.45% price change this week, while FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -3.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +1.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

AXTA is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

FUL is expected to report earnings on Jan 20, 2027.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+1.54% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

View a ticker or compare two or three
AXTA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FUL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement

AXTA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AXTA has been closely correlated with PPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AXTA jumps, then PPG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AXTA
1D Price
Change %
AXTA100%
-2.60%
PPG - AXTA
72%
Closely correlated
-2.19%
SHW - AXTA
68%
Closely correlated
-2.48%
RPM - AXTA
67%
Closely correlated
-2.93%
OLN - AXTA
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
FUL - AXTA
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.52%
More

FUL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUL has been closely correlated with RPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUL jumps, then RPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUL
1D Price
Change %
FUL100%
-2.52%
RPM - FUL
72%
Closely correlated
-2.93%
PPG - FUL
68%
Closely correlated
-2.19%
OLN - FUL
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
ASIX - FUL
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
AVNT - FUL
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.11%
More
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BAI40.440.32
+0.80%
iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF
ECOW26.62-0.01
-0.04%
Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW)
PBJN31.36-0.08
-0.24%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - June (PBJN)
JHDV45.55-0.29
-0.63%
John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF (JHDV)
CDC76.86-0.57
-0.74%
VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC)