Ad is loading...
AZASF
Price
$0.31
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
EGO
Price
$15.20
Change
-$0.09 (-0.59%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
94 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AZASF vs EGO

Header iconAZASF vs EGO Comparison
Open Charts AZASF vs EGOBanner chart's image
Arizona Gold & Silver
Price$0.31
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5K
CapitalizationN/A
Eldorado Gold
Price$15.20
Change-$0.09 (-0.59%)
Volume$2.42M
CapitalizationN/A
AZASF vs EGO Comparison Chart
Loading...
EGO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AZASF vs. EGO commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZASF is a Hold and EGO is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (AZASF: $0.31 vs. EGO: $15.20)
Brand notoriety: AZASF and EGO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AZASF: 15% vs. EGO: 150%
Market capitalization -- AZASF: $22.09M vs. EGO: $2.86B
AZASF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $22.09M. EGO’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AZASF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEGO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AZASF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EGO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AZASF is a better buy in the long-term than EGO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EGO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • EGO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

AZASF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -9.41% price change this week, while EGO (@Precious Metals) price change was -8.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

EGO is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EGO($2.86B) has a higher market cap than AZASF($22.1M). EGO YTD gains are higher at: 17.194 vs. AZASF (-5.372). EGO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 458M vs. AZASF (-1.48M). EGO has more cash in the bank: 544M vs. AZASF (135K). AZASF has less debt than EGO: AZASF (100K) vs EGO (659M). EGO has higher revenues than AZASF: EGO (1.01B) vs AZASF (0).
AZASFEGOAZASF / EGO
Capitalization22.1M2.86B1%
EBITDA-1.48M458M-0%
Gain YTD-5.37217.194-31%
P/E RatioN/A26.63-
Revenue01.01B-
Total Cash135K544M0%
Total Debt100K659M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AZASF vs EGO: Fundamental Ratings
AZASF
EGO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5742
SMR RATING
1..100
9575
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4461
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10099
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AZASF's Valuation (61) in the null industry is in the same range as EGO (88) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AZASF’s stock grew similarly to EGO’s over the last 12 months.

EGO's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AZASF (57) in the null industry. This means that EGO’s stock grew similarly to AZASF’s over the last 12 months.

EGO's SMR Rating (75) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AZASF (95) in the null industry. This means that EGO’s stock grew similarly to AZASF’s over the last 12 months.

AZASF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as EGO (61) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AZASF’s stock grew similarly to EGO’s over the last 12 months.

EGO's P/E Growth Rating (99) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AZASF (100) in the null industry. This means that EGO’s stock grew similarly to AZASF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EGO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EGO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HMVTX20.53-0.12
-0.58%
Hartford MidCap Value R5
RMFCX58.23-0.50
-0.85%
American Funds American Mutual R3
FDTEX38.02-0.55
-1.43%
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock M
EGWAX13.77-0.20
-1.43%
Allspring Discovery Small Cap Gr Gr A
SGGIX93.79-2.32
-2.41%
DWS Large Cap Focus Growth Inst

AZASF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AZASF and SAND have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AZASF and SAND's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AZASF
1D Price
Change %
AZASF100%
-0.96%
SAND - AZASF
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.37%
HL - AZASF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.79%
SSRM - AZASF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NEM - AZASF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
EGO - AZASF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
More