Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZEMX vs RNWBX
AZEMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts AZEMX vs RNWBX
Alger Emerging Markets Z
Price$12.34
Change+$0.14 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.36M
American Funds New World R2
Price$84.22
Change+$0.87 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.99B
AZEMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZEMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZEMX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 69B vs. AZEMX (17.4M). AZEMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: AZEMX (0.60) vs RNWBX (0.13). AZEMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: AZEMX (11 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). AZEMX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). AZEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.97 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZEMX: RNWBX (250) vs AZEMX (500000). RNWBX (10.04) and AZEMX (9.79) have marching annual gain over last year. RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 30.16 vs. AZEMX (21.14).
| AZEMX | RNWBX | AZEMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.67 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.67 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.650 | 14.507 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.4M | 69B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.13 | 446% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.79 | 10.04 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.44 | 32.68 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.14 | 30.16 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.67 | 60.47 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement