Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZEMX vs RNWBX
AZEMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts AZEMX vs RNWBX
Alger Emerging Markets Z
Price$12.40
Change+$0.05 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.72M
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.04
Change+$0.21 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.13B
AZEMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZEMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZEMX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.1B vs. AZEMX (17.7M). AZEMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: AZEMX (0.56) vs RNWBX (0.13). AZEMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: AZEMX (11 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). AZEMX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). AZEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.97 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZEMX: RNWBX (250) vs AZEMX (500000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.23 vs. AZEMX (9.38). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.46 vs. AZEMX (13.60).
| AZEMX | RNWBX | AZEMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.67 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.67 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.035 | 15.622 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.7M | 70.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.13 | 440% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.38 | 10.23 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.82 | 38.39 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.60 | 24.46 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.83 | 60.70 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement