Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZEMX vs RNWBX
AZEMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts AZEMX vs RNWBX
Alger Emerging Markets Z
Price$12.38
Change+$0.11 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.47M
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.41
Change+$0.71 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.98B
AZEMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZEMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZEMX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70B vs. AZEMX (17.5M). AZEMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: AZEMX (0.57) vs RNWBX (0.13). AZEMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: AZEMX (11 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). AZEMX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). AZEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.97 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZEMX: RNWBX (250) vs AZEMX (500000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.48 vs. AZEMX (14.10). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 21.46 vs. AZEMX (8.34).
| AZEMX | RNWBX | AZEMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.67 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.67 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.296 | 16.125 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.5M | 70B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.13 | 442% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.10 | 17.48 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.77 | 30.84 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.34 | 21.46 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.47 | 64.57 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers