Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZEMX vs RNWBX
AZEMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts AZEMX vs RNWBX
Alger Emerging Markets Z
Price$13.26
Change+$0.04 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.64M
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.43
Change+$0.22 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.08B
AZEMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZEMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZEMX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. AZEMX (18.6M). AZEMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: AZEMX (0.56) vs RNWBX (0.13). AZEMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: AZEMX (12 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). AZEMX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). AZEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.97 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZEMX: RNWBX (250) vs AZEMX (500000). AZEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.49 vs. RNWBX (16.45). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 27.32 vs. AZEMX (13.51).
| AZEMX | RNWBX | AZEMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.67 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.67 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.438 | 22.950 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.6M | 74.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.13 | 443% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.49 | 16.45 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.66 | 46.19 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.51 | 27.32 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.08 | 90.27 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement