AZIHF
Price
$26.17
Change
-$0.29 (-1.10%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
3.28B
SII
Price
$41.96
Change
-$0.01 (-0.02%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
964.89M
32 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AZIHF vs SII

Header iconAZIHF vs SII Comparison
Open Charts AZIHF vs SIIBanner chart's image
Azimut Holding Spa
Price$26.17
Change-$0.29 (-1.10%)
Volume$283
Capitalization3.28B
Sprott
Price$41.96
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
Volume$96.11K
Capitalization964.89M
AZIHF vs SII Comparison Chart
Loading...
AZIHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SII
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AZIHF vs. SII commentary
Jan 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZIHF is a Hold and SII is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 20, 2025
Stock price -- (AZIHF: $26.17 vs. SII: $41.96)
Brand notoriety: AZIHF and SII are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AZIHF: 17% vs. SII: 108%
Market capitalization -- AZIHF: $3.28B vs. SII: $964.89M
AZIHF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $3.28B. SII’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $964.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AZIHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSII’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AZIHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SII’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SII is a better buy in the long-term than AZIHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AZIHF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SII’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AZIHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SII’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AZIHF is a better buy in the short-term than SII.

Price Growth

AZIHF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.10% price change this week, while SII (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

SII is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.49% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AZIHF($3.28B) has a higher market cap than SII($965M). SII has higher P/E ratio than AZIHF: SII (23.24) vs AZIHF (7.62). AZIHF YTD gains are higher at: 10.890 vs. SII (-0.498). AZIHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 605M vs. SII (57.2M). AZIHF has more cash in the bank: 346M vs. SII (22.9M). SII has less debt than AZIHF: SII (24.2M) vs AZIHF (586M). AZIHF has higher revenues than SII: AZIHF (1.16B) vs SII (141M).
AZIHFSIIAZIHF / SII
Capitalization3.28B965M340%
EBITDA605M57.2M1,058%
Gain YTD10.890-0.498-2,187%
P/E Ratio7.6223.2433%
Revenue1.16B141M824%
Total Cash346M22.9M1,511%
Total Debt586M24.2M2,421%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AZIHF vs SII: Fundamental Ratings
AZIHF
SII
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8436
SMR RATING
1..100
3056
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5555
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8061
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AZIHF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as SII (34). This means that AZIHF’s stock grew similarly to SII’s over the last 12 months.

SII's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AZIHF (84). This means that SII’s stock grew somewhat faster than AZIHF’s over the last 12 months.

AZIHF's SMR Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as SII (56). This means that AZIHF’s stock grew similarly to SII’s over the last 12 months.

AZIHF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as SII (55). This means that AZIHF’s stock grew similarly to SII’s over the last 12 months.

SII's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as AZIHF (80). This means that SII’s stock grew similarly to AZIHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AZIHFSII
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
68%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
56%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
44%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AZIHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SII
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LSHCX35.260.44
+1.26%
Kinetics Spin-Off and Corp Rest Adv C
OALGX21.150.25
+1.20%
Optimum Large Cap Growth A
ICSFX29.690.21
+0.71%
Invesco Comstock R6
WLCAX13.660.07
+0.52%
Allspring Large Company Value A
LEISX22.700.09
+0.40%
Federated Hermes Equity Income IS

AZIHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AZIHF and AJMPF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AZIHF and AJMPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AZIHF
1D Price
Change %
AZIHF100%
N/A
AJMPF - AZIHF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMNM - AZIHF
13%
Poorly correlated
-6.80%
SII - AZIHF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
AGFMF - AZIHF
3%
Poorly correlated
+6.99%
AABVF - AZIHF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SII and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SII has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SII jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SII
1D Price
Change %
SII100%
-0.02%
BN - SII
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
BAM - SII
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
BX - SII
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.83%
BK - SII
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.26%
CGBD - SII
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
More