AZIHF
Price
$38.37
Change
+$4.12 (+12.03%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
4.94B
SII
Price
$67.75
Change
+$1.07 (+1.60%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.75B
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AZIHF vs SII

Header iconAZIHF vs SII Comparison
Open Charts AZIHF vs SIIBanner chart's image
Azimut Holding Spa
Price$38.37
Change+$4.12 (+12.03%)
Volume$371
Capitalization4.94B
Sprott
Price$67.75
Change+$1.07 (+1.60%)
Volume$185.43K
Capitalization1.75B
AZIHF vs SII Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AZIHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SII
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AZIHF vs. SII commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZIHF is a Buy and SII is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (AZIHF: $38.37 vs. SII: $67.75)
Brand notoriety: AZIHF and SII are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AZIHF: 143% vs. SII: 101%
Market capitalization -- AZIHF: $4.94B vs. SII: $1.75B
AZIHF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $4.94B. SII’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AZIHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSII’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AZIHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SII’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AZIHF and SII are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AZIHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SII’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AZIHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SII’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AZIHF is a better buy in the short-term than SII.

Price Growth

AZIHF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SII (@Investment Managers) price change was +2.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

SII is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AZIHF($4.94B) has a higher market cap than SII($1.75B). SII has higher P/E ratio than AZIHF: SII (34.92) vs AZIHF (9.61). SII (63.355) and AZIHF (62.585) have similar YTD gains . AZIHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 723M vs. SII (73.9M). AZIHF has more cash in the bank: 426M vs. SII (51.5M). SII has less debt than AZIHF: SII (18.7M) vs AZIHF (23.3M). AZIHF has higher revenues than SII: AZIHF (1.35B) vs SII (186M).
AZIHFSIIAZIHF / SII
Capitalization4.94B1.75B282%
EBITDA723M73.9M978%
Gain YTD62.58563.35599%
P/E Ratio9.6134.9228%
Revenue1.35B186M723%
Total Cash426M51.5M827%
Total Debt23.3M18.7M125%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AZIHF vs SII: Fundamental Ratings
AZIHF
SII
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
296
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5134
SMR RATING
1..100
3453
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4042
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1319
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5032

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AZIHF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as SII (27). This means that AZIHF’s stock grew similarly to SII’s over the last 12 months.

SII's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as AZIHF (51). This means that SII’s stock grew similarly to AZIHF’s over the last 12 months.

AZIHF's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as SII (53). This means that AZIHF’s stock grew similarly to SII’s over the last 12 months.

AZIHF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as SII (42). This means that AZIHF’s stock grew similarly to SII’s over the last 12 months.

AZIHF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as SII (19). This means that AZIHF’s stock grew similarly to SII’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AZIHFSII
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AZIHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SII
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRZRX16.490.15
+0.92%
T. Rowe Price Real Assets Z
PSBPX31.140.16
+0.52%
Principal SmallCap R5
PRVRX13.47N/A
N/A
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val R
MPGSX12.49-0.03
-0.26%
MassMutual Disciplined Gr R5
PCPAX22.92-0.06
-0.26%
PACE Large Co Value Equity A

AZIHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AZIHF and AJMPF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AZIHF and AJMPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AZIHF
1D Price
Change %
AZIHF100%
N/A
AJMPF - AZIHF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMNM - AZIHF
13%
Poorly correlated
+3.03%
SII - AZIHF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
AGFMF - AZIHF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.64%
BRSGF - AZIHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More