AZLCZ
Price
$1150.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
172.19M
BVERS
Price
$3100.01
Change
-$49.99 (-1.59%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
77.12M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AZLCZ vs BVERS

Header iconAZLCZ vs BVERS Comparison
Open Charts AZLCZ vs BVERSBanner chart's image
Aztec Land & Cattle
Price$1150.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$40
Capitalization172.19M
Beaver Coal
Price$3100.01
Change-$49.99 (-1.59%)
Volume$1
Capitalization77.12M
AZLCZ vs BVERS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AZLCZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BVERS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AZLCZ vs. BVERS commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZLCZ is a Hold and BVERS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (AZLCZ: $1150.00 vs. BVERS: $3100.01)
Brand notoriety: AZLCZ and BVERS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AZLCZ: 215% vs. BVERS: 24%
Market capitalization -- AZLCZ: $172.19M vs. BVERS: $77.12M
AZLCZ [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $172.19M. BVERS’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $77.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AZLCZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBVERS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AZLCZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BVERS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AZLCZ is a better buy in the long-term than BVERS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AZLCZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BVERS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AZLCZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BVERS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AZLCZ and BVERS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AZLCZ (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -2.12% price change this week, while BVERS (@Real Estate Development) price change was -4.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +0.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.58%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+0.87% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AZLCZ($172M) has a higher market cap than BVERS($77.1M). AZLCZ YTD gains are higher at: 38.554 vs. BVERS (-6.181).
AZLCZBVERSAZLCZ / BVERS
Capitalization172M77.1M223%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD38.554-6.181-624%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AZLCZ vs BVERS: Fundamental Ratings
AZLCZ
BVERS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8880
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4361
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BVERS's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as AZLCZ (32). This means that BVERS’s stock grew similarly to AZLCZ’s over the last 12 months.

BVERS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AZLCZ (100). This means that BVERS’s stock grew similarly to AZLCZ’s over the last 12 months.

BVERS's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AZLCZ (100). This means that BVERS’s stock grew similarly to AZLCZ’s over the last 12 months.

AZLCZ's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as BVERS (61). This means that AZLCZ’s stock grew similarly to BVERS’s over the last 12 months.

AZLCZ's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BVERS (100). This means that AZLCZ’s stock grew similarly to BVERS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AZLCZBVERS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
60%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AZLCZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BVERS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TLGYF13.020.07
+0.54%
TLGY Acquisition Corporation
LTRE0.31N/A
N/A
Learning Tree International, Inc.
LCTSF28.65N/A
N/A
Lectra Systems
TTRAF3.08N/A
N/A
Telstra Group Limited
JRFIF623.98N/A
N/A
JAPAN MET FD INV CORP.

AZLCZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AZLCZ and HBUV have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AZLCZ and HBUV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AZLCZ
1D Price
Change %
AZLCZ100%
N/A
HBUV - AZLCZ
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DLMI - AZLCZ
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
MGAG - AZLCZ
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BVERS - AZLCZ
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
VTAGY - AZLCZ
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BVERS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BVERS and MBHCF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BVERS and MBHCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BVERS
1D Price
Change %
BVERS100%
-1.59%
MBHCF - BVERS
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AZLCZ - BVERS
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRPTF - BVERS
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EVGPF - BVERS
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VTAGY - BVERS
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More