Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZMCX vs RNWBX
AZMCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts AZMCX vs RNWBX
Virtus NFJ Emerging Markets Value C
Price$18.57
Change+$0.34 (+1.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.21M
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.82
Change+$1.12 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.85B
AZMCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZMCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZMCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.9B vs. AZMCX (15.2M). AZMCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: AZMCX (0.95) vs RNWBX (0.13). AZMCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: AZMCX (13 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). AZMCX (2.48) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). AZMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZMCX: RNWBX (250) vs AZMCX (2500). AZMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.54 vs. RNWBX (12.55). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 22.52 vs. AZMCX (4.74).
| AZMCX | RNWBX | AZMCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.67 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.48 | 1.67 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.377 | 18.042 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.2M | 70.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.13 | 737% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.54 | 12.55 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.38 | 34.74 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.74 | 22.52 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.66 | 86.65 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement