Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZMCX vs RNWBX
AZMCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts AZMCX vs RNWBX
Virtus NFJ Emerging Markets Value C
Price$17.88
Change-$0.16 (-0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.04M
American Funds New World R2
Price$83.92
Change-$0.55 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.4B
AZMCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZMCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZMCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 69.4B vs. AZMCX (15M). AZMCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: AZMCX (0.95) vs RNWBX (0.13). AZMCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: AZMCX (13 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). AZMCX (2.48) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). AZMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZMCX: RNWBX (250) vs AZMCX (2500). AZMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.66 vs. RNWBX (10.68). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 21.01 vs. AZMCX (5.34).
| AZMCX | RNWBX | AZMCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.67 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.48 | 1.67 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.143 | 14.099 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15M | 69.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.13 | 737% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.66 | 10.68 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.19 | 30.02 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.34 | 21.01 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.94 | 62.01 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement