Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZMCX vs RNWBX
AZMCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts AZMCX vs RNWBX
Virtus NFJ Emerging Markets Value C
Price$20.59
Change+$0.14 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.29M
American Funds New World R2
Price$91.84
Change+$0.24 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.42B
AZMCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZMCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Oct 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZMCX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.4B vs. AZMCX (16.3M). AZMCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: AZMCX (0.83) vs RNWBX (0.12). AZMCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: AZMCX (13 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). AZMCX (2.48) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). AZMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZMCX: RNWBX (250) vs AZMCX (2500). AZMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.53 vs. RNWBX (16.14). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 25.27 vs. AZMCX (12.12).
| AZMCX | RNWBX | AZMCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.67 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.48 | 1.67 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.792 | 24.867 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.3M | 75.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 0.12 | 688% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.53 | 16.14 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.09 | 55.76 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.12 | 25.27 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.24 | 86.17 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement