Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZMCX vs RNWBX
AZMCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts AZMCX vs RNWBX
Virtus NFJ Emerging Markets Value C
Price$20.96
Change+$0.10 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.74M
American Funds New World R2
Price$91.30
Change+$0.31 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.02B
AZMCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZMCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Oct 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZMCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75B vs. AZMCX (16.7M). AZMCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: AZMCX (0.83) vs RNWBX (0.12). AZMCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: AZMCX (13 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). AZMCX (2.48) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). AZMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZMCX: RNWBX (250) vs AZMCX (2500). AZMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.83 vs. RNWBX (12.70). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 29.53 vs. AZMCX (20.15).
| AZMCX | RNWBX | AZMCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.67 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.48 | 1.67 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.455 | 24.133 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.7M | 75B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 0.12 | 688% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.83 | 12.70 | 188% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.93 | 50.67 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.15 | 29.53 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.68 | 90.44 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement