Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZMCX vs RNWBX
AZMCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts AZMCX vs RNWBX
Virtus NFJ Emerging Markets Value C
Price$17.63
Change-$0.12 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.23M
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.05
Change+$0.09 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.31B
AZMCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZMCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZMCX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.3B vs. AZMCX (15.2M). AZMCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: AZMCX (0.96) vs RNWBX (0.13). AZMCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: AZMCX (13 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). AZMCX (2.48) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). AZMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZMCX: RNWBX (250) vs AZMCX (2500). AZMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.79 vs. RNWBX (9.60). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 23.92 vs. AZMCX (4.94).
| AZMCX | RNWBX | AZMCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.67 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.48 | 1.67 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.260 | 15.636 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.2M | 70.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.13 | 747% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.79 | 9.60 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.02 | 35.47 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.94 | 23.92 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.66 | 62.79 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement