Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZMCX vs RNWBX
AZMCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts AZMCX vs RNWBX
Virtus NFJ Emerging Markets Value C
Price$17.24
Change-$0.24 (-1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.19M
American Funds New World R2
Price$81.86
Change-$1.00 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.56B
AZMCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZMCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZMCX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 68.6B vs. AZMCX (15.2M). AZMCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: AZMCX (1.01) vs RNWBX (0.13). AZMCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: AZMCX (12 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). AZMCX (2.48) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). AZMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZMCX: RNWBX (250) vs AZMCX (2500). AZMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.27 vs. RNWBX (7.09). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 28.56 vs. AZMCX (14.48).
| AZMCX | RNWBX | AZMCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.67 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.48 | 1.67 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.506 | 11.298 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.2M | 68.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 0.13 | 750% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.27 | 7.09 | 173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.57 | 32.44 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.48 | 28.56 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.84 | 54.60 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement