Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZMCX vs RNWHX
AZMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts AZMCX vs RNWHX
Virtus NFJ Emerging Markets Value C
Price$17.63
Change-$0.12 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.23M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$88.34
Change+$0.10 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.31B
AZMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZMCX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 70.3B vs. AZMCX (15.2M). RNWHX (0.99) and AZMCX (0.96) have matching dividends . AZMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: AZMCX (13 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). AZMCX (2.48) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). AZMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZMCX: RNWHX (250) vs AZMCX (2500). AZMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.79 vs. RNWHX (10.75). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 28.65 vs. AZMCX (4.94).
| AZMCX | RNWHX | AZMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.72 | 263% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.48 | 0.72 | 344% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.260 | 16.206 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.2M | 70.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.99 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.79 | 10.75 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.02 | 38.21 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.94 | 28.65 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.66 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement