Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZMCX vs RNWHX
AZMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts AZMCX vs RNWHX
Virtus NFJ Emerging Markets Value C
Price$20.96
Change+$0.10 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.74M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$95.05
Change+$0.33 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.33B
AZMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Oct 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZMCX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. AZMCX (16.7M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than AZMCX: RNWHX (0.93) vs AZMCX (0.83). AZMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: AZMCX (13 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). AZMCX (2.48) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). AZMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZMCX: RNWHX (250) vs AZMCX (2500). AZMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.83 vs. RNWHX (13.88). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 34.48 vs. AZMCX (20.15).
| AZMCX | RNWHX | AZMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.72 | 263% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.48 | 0.72 | 344% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.455 | 25.033 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.7M | 75.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 0.93 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.83 | 13.88 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.93 | 53.71 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.15 | 34.48 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.68 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement