Advertisement
AZMTF vs GRRLF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZMTF is a Hold and GRRLF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AZMTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGRRLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- AZMTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- GRRLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AZMTF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRRLF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AZMTF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
- GRRLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AZMTF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +4.47% price change this week, while GRRLF (@Steel) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.73%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +1.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.69%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.12% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
@Steel (+1.65% weekly)The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.
| AZMTF | GRRLF | AZMTF / GRRLF | |
| Capitalization | 45.3M | 145M | 31% |
| EBITDA | -3.07M | 211M | -1% |
| Gain YTD | 18.328 | -17.836 | -103% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 3.70 | - |
| Revenue | 201K | 570M | 0% |
| Total Cash | 11.7M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 92.1K | N/A | - |
AZMTF | GRRLF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 89 | 48 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 99 Overvalued | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 60 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 82 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 26 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GRRLF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AZMTF (99). This means that GRRLF’s stock grew significantly faster than AZMTF’s over the last 12 months.
GRRLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AZMTF (100). This means that GRRLF’s stock grew similarly to AZMTF’s over the last 12 months.
GRRLF's SMR Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as AZMTF (90). This means that GRRLF’s stock grew similarly to AZMTF’s over the last 12 months.
AZMTF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRRLF (82). This means that AZMTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRRLF’s over the last 12 months.
AZMTF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as GRRLF (26). This means that AZMTF’s stock grew similarly to GRRLF’s over the last 12 months.
| AZMTF | GRRLF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 39% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 30% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 38% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 34% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 34% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 78% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 48% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VMFGX | 469.38 | 5.64 | +1.22% |
| Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Idx I | |||
| PRRCX | 12.51 | 0.02 | +0.16% |
| Victory Pioneer Equ Premium Income C | |||
| RAIIX | 28.73 | -0.05 | -0.17% |
| Manning & Napier Rainier Intl Discv I | |||
| COSYX | 13.68 | -0.03 | -0.22% |
| Columbia Overseas Value Inst3 | |||
| CBWTF | 0.11 | N/A | -3.59% |
| Auxly Cannabis Group Inc. | |||
AZMTF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AZMTF and ARAFF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AZMTF and ARAFF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AZMTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZMTF | 100% | +4.78% | ||
| ARAFF - AZMTF | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.92% | ||
| EUEMF - AZMTF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GRRLF - AZMTF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AUMC - AZMTF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AZMCF - AZMTF | 5% Poorly correlated | -3.81% | ||
More | ||||
GRRLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GRRLF and PWMCF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRRLF and PWMCF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GRRLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRRLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PWMCF - GRRLF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AFBOF - GRRLF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MTRN - GRRLF | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.66% | ||
| LLLAF - GRRLF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LEMIF - GRRLF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||