AZN vs BIIB
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZN is a Hold and BIIB is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AZN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBIIB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AZN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- BIIB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AZN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BIIB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AZN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- BIIB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AZN (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а -1.83% price change this week, while BIIB (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was -2.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was -1.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.90%.
Reported Earning Dates
AZN is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.
BIIB is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Major (-1.62% weekly)The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.
| AZN | BIIB | AZN / BIIB | |
| Capitalization | 209B | 31.3B | 668% |
| EBITDA | 13.4B | 2.04B | 658% |
| Gain YTD | -0.858 | -43.398 | 2% |
| P/E Ratio | 35.30 | 26.95 | 131% |
| Revenue | 45.8B | 9.84B | 466% |
| Total Cash | 5.86B | 1.05B | 558% |
| Total Debt | 28.6B | 7.34B | 390% |
AZN | BIIB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 6 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 23 Undervalued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AZN's Valuation (23) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BIIB (85) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that AZN’s stock grew somewhat faster than BIIB’s over the last 12 months.
AZN's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BIIB (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that AZN’s stock grew somewhat faster than BIIB’s over the last 12 months.
AZN's SMR Rating (52) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as BIIB (66) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that AZN’s stock grew similarly to BIIB’s over the last 12 months.
AZN's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as BIIB (65) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that AZN’s stock grew similarly to BIIB’s over the last 12 months.
AZN's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as BIIB (96) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that AZN’s stock grew similarly to BIIB’s over the last 12 months.
| AZN | BIIB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 54% | 5 days ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 46% | 9 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 62% |
AZN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AZN has been loosely correlated with NVS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AZN jumps, then NVS could also see price increases.
BIIB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BIIB has been loosely correlated with AMGN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BIIB jumps, then AMGN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BIIB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIIB | 100% | -0.62% | ||
| AMGN - BIIB | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| PFE - BIIB | 33% Poorly correlated | +2.29% | ||
| OGN - BIIB | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.97% | ||
| NVS - BIIB | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.35% | ||
| GILD - BIIB | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.62% | ||
More | ||||