Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZNAX vs RLBFX
AZNAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts AZNAX vs RLBFX
Virtus Income & Growth A
Price$11.53
Change+$0.04 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.69B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.89
Change+$0.11 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.74B
AZNAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZNAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZNAX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. AZNAX (4.69B). AZNAX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: AZNAX (2.12) vs RLBFX (1.97). AZNAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: AZNAX (19 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). AZNAX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). AZNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZNAX: RLBFX (250) vs AZNAX (2500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.32 vs. AZNAX (3.80). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.53 vs. AZNAX (4.74).
| AZNAX | RLBFX | AZNAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.29 | 393% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.29 | 393% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.987 | 14.331 | 35% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.69B | 263B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.12 | 1.97 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.80 | 9.32 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.92 | 42.18 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.74 | 40.53 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.03 | 74.39 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement