It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AZNCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMRK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AZNCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
AZNCF (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а -1.20% price change this week, while MRK (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was +1.43% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was -1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.12%.
MRK is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.
The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.
AZNCF | MRK | AZNCF / MRK | |
Capitalization | 223B | 332B | 67% |
EBITDA | 12.9B | 6.91B | 187% |
Gain YTD | 0.305 | -3.630 | -8% |
P/E Ratio | 36.10 | 935.64 | 4% |
Revenue | 44.5B | 60.1B | 74% |
Total Cash | 5.81B | 7.09B | 82% |
Total Debt | 29.8B | 35.1B | 85% |
AZNCF | MRK | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 21 Undervalued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 43 | 36 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | 33 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MRK's Valuation (17) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as AZNCF (21) in the null industry. This means that MRK’s stock grew similarly to AZNCF’s over the last 12 months.
MRK's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as AZNCF (43) in the null industry. This means that MRK’s stock grew similarly to AZNCF’s over the last 12 months.
MRK's SMR Rating (33) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as AZNCF (52) in the null industry. This means that MRK’s stock grew similarly to AZNCF’s over the last 12 months.
MRK's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as AZNCF (60) in the null industry. This means that MRK’s stock grew similarly to AZNCF’s over the last 12 months.
AZNCF's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as MRK (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that AZNCF’s stock grew similarly to MRK’s over the last 12 months.
AZNCF | MRK | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago67% | 3 days ago47% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago59% | 3 days ago65% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago59% | 3 days ago49% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago64% | 3 days ago48% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago55% | 3 days ago50% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago63% | 3 days ago46% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 12 days ago47% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago50% | 7 days ago50% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago58% | 3 days ago56% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago60% | 3 days ago49% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AZNCF has been loosely correlated with AZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AZNCF jumps, then AZN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AZNCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AZNCF | 100% | +1.00% | ||
AZN - AZNCF | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.99% | ||
NVS - AZNCF | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.52% | ||
SNY - AZNCF | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
MRK - AZNCF | 19% Poorly correlated | -0.44% | ||
BAYRY - AZNCF | 18% Poorly correlated | +2.75% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that MRK and AZN have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MRK and AZN's prices will move in lockstep.