Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZNCX vs RLBCX
AZNCX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts AZNCX vs RLBCX
Virtus Income & Growth C
Price$9.86
Change+$0.03 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.69B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.54
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.74B
AZNCX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZNCX vs. RLBCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZNCX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. AZNCX (4.69B). AZNCX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: AZNCX (1.90) vs RLBCX (1.46). AZNCX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: AZNCX (19 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). AZNCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). AZNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZNCX: RLBCX (250) vs AZNCX (2500). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.62 vs. AZNCX (2.23). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.95 vs. AZNCX (-2.65).
| AZNCX | RLBCX | AZNCX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.89 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.89 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.573 | 13.744 | 26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.69B | 263B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.90 | 1.46 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.23 | 8.62 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.37 | 39.76 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.65 | 36.95 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.31 | 67.89 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement