Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZNCX vs RLBEX
AZNCX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts AZNCX vs RLBEX
Virtus Income & Growth C
Price$9.81
Change+$0.03 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.73B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$37.47
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.46B
AZNCX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZNCX vs. RLBEX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZNCX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 255B vs. AZNCX (4.73B). AZNCX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: AZNCX (2.05) vs RLBEX (1.81). AZNCX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: AZNCX (19 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). AZNCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). AZNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZNCX: RLBEX (250) vs AZNCX (2500). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.23 vs. AZNCX (3.42). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 37.05 vs. AZNCX (-1.58).
| AZNCX | RLBEX | AZNCX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.59 | 322% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.59 | 322% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.487 | 10.001 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.73B | 255B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.05 | 1.81 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.42 | 7.23 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.56 | 34.20 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.58 | 37.05 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.89 | 74.35 | 9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers