Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZNCX vs RLBEX
AZNCX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts AZNCX vs RLBEX
Virtus Income & Growth C
Price$9.86
Change+$0.03 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.69B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$38.74
Change+$0.11 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.74B
AZNCX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZNCX vs. RLBEX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZNCX is a Hold and RLBEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. AZNCX (4.69B). AZNCX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: AZNCX (1.90) vs RLBEX (1.71). AZNCX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: AZNCX (19 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). AZNCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). AZNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZNCX: RLBEX (250) vs AZNCX (2500). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.98 vs. AZNCX (2.23). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 38.72 vs. AZNCX (-2.65).
| AZNCX | RLBEX | AZNCX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.59 | 322% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.59 | 322% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.573 | 14.042 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.69B | 263B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.90 | 1.71 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.23 | 8.98 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.37 | 41.02 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.65 | 38.72 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.31 | 73.32 | 13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement