Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZNCX vs RLBFX
AZNCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts AZNCX vs RLBFX
Virtus Income & Growth C
Price$9.81
Change+$0.03 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.73B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$37.62
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.46B
AZNCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZNCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZNCX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 255B vs. AZNCX (4.73B). RLBFX (2.08) and AZNCX (2.05) have matching dividends . AZNCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: AZNCX (19 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). AZNCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). AZNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZNCX: RLBFX (250) vs AZNCX (2500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.58 vs. AZNCX (3.42). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.85 vs. AZNCX (-1.58).
| AZNCX | RLBFX | AZNCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.29 | 655% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.29 | 655% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.487 | 10.215 | 24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.73B | 255B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.05 | 2.08 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.42 | 7.58 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.56 | 35.30 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.58 | 38.85 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.89 | 75.37 | 9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement