Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZNCX vs RLBFX
AZNCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts AZNCX vs RLBFX
Virtus Income & Growth C
Price$9.98
Change-$0.02 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.8B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.69
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.25B
AZNCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZNCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZNCX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. AZNCX (4.8B). RLBFX (2.05) and AZNCX (1.97) have matching dividends . AZNCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: AZNCX (19 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). AZNCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). AZNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZNCX: RLBFX (250) vs AZNCX (2500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.77 vs. AZNCX (5.09). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.27 vs. AZNCX (3.33).
| AZNCX | RLBFX | AZNCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.29 | 655% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.29 | 655% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.792 | 13.349 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.8B | 263B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.97 | 2.05 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.09 | 9.77 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.35 | 44.38 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.33 | 44.27 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.41 | 82.55 | 13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement