Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZNCX vs RLBFX
AZNCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts AZNCX vs RLBFX
Virtus Income & Growth C
Price$9.99
Change-$0.04 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.81B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.00
Change-$0.10 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.1B
AZNCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZNCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZNCX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. AZNCX (4.81B). RLBFX (2.00) and AZNCX (1.96) have matching dividends . AZNCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: AZNCX (19 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). AZNCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). AZNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZNCX: RLBFX (250) vs AZNCX (2500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.30 vs. AZNCX (5.64). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.24 vs. AZNCX (0.67).
| AZNCX | RLBFX | AZNCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.29 | 655% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.29 | 655% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.204 | 14.654 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.81B | 266B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.96 | 2.00 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.64 | 10.30 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.06 | 52.37 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.67 | 44.24 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.64 | 79.97 | 13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement