Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZNCX vs RLBFX
AZNCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts AZNCX vs RLBFX
Virtus Income & Growth C
Price$9.83
Change-$0.04 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.71B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.78
Change-$0.16 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.89B
AZNCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZNCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZNCX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 264B vs. AZNCX (4.71B). RLBFX (1.97) and AZNCX (1.90) have matching dividends . AZNCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: AZNCX (19 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). AZNCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). AZNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZNCX: RLBFX (250) vs AZNCX (2500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.13 vs. AZNCX (2.64). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.76 vs. AZNCX (-2.73).
| AZNCX | RLBFX | AZNCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.29 | 655% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.29 | 655% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.678 | 14.008 | 26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.71B | 264B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.90 | 1.97 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.64 | 9.13 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.49 | 41.78 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.73 | 39.76 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.42 | 73.89 | 13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement