AZZ
Price
$90.84
Change
-$0.26 (-0.29%)
Updated
Jun 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.94B
19 days until earnings call
EAT
Price
$176.60
Change
-$3.40 (-1.89%)
Updated
Jun 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.85B
48 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AZZ vs EAT

Header iconAZZ vs EAT Comparison
Open Charts AZZ vs EATBanner chart's image
AZZ
Price$90.84
Change-$0.26 (-0.29%)
Volume$1.37K
Capitalization1.94B
Brinker International
Price$176.60
Change-$3.40 (-1.89%)
Volume$5.44K
Capitalization7.85B
AZZ vs EAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AZZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AZZ vs. EAT commentary
Jun 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZZ is a StrongBuy and EAT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 26, 2025
Stock price -- (AZZ: $91.10 vs. EAT: $180.00)
Brand notoriety: AZZ and EAT are both not notable
AZZ represents the Miscellaneous Commercial Services, while EAT is part of the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AZZ: 196% vs. EAT: 75%
Market capitalization -- AZZ: $1.94B vs. EAT: $7.85B
AZZ [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $1.94B. EAT’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $7.85B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $204.18B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.57B. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AZZ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileEAT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AZZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • EAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EAT is a better buy in the long-term than AZZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AZZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EAT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AZZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • EAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AZZ is a better buy in the short-term than EAT.

Price Growth

AZZ (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +1.82% price change this week, while EAT (@Restaurants) price change was +0.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +0.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.62%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

AZZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 14, 2025.

EAT is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+0.18% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

@Restaurants (-0.33% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EAT($7.85B) has a higher market cap than AZZ($1.94B). AZZ (25.45) and EAT (24.57) have similar P/E ratio . EAT YTD gains are higher at: 36.065 vs. AZZ (11.658). EAT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 637M vs. AZZ (307M). EAT has more cash in the bank: 17.5M vs. AZZ (7.51M). AZZ has less debt than EAT: AZZ (1B) vs EAT (1.72B). EAT has higher revenues than AZZ: EAT (5.13B) vs AZZ (1.51B).
AZZEATAZZ / EAT
Capitalization1.94B7.85B25%
EBITDA307M637M48%
Gain YTD11.65836.06532%
P/E Ratio25.4524.57104%
Revenue1.51B5.13B29%
Total Cash7.51M17.5M43%
Total Debt1B1.72B58%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AZZ vs EAT: Fundamental Ratings
AZZ
EAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7578
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1312
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5137
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
735
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AZZ's Valuation (50) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as EAT (50) in the Restaurants industry. This means that AZZ’s stock grew similarly to EAT’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as AZZ (13) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that EAT’s stock grew similarly to AZZ’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's SMR Rating (100) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as AZZ (100) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that EAT’s stock grew similarly to AZZ’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as AZZ (51) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that EAT’s stock grew similarly to AZZ’s over the last 12 months.

AZZ's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as EAT (35) in the Restaurants industry. This means that AZZ’s stock grew similarly to EAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AZZEAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AZZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ONE.X0.0101260.000162
+1.63%
Harmony cryptocurrency
PAXG.X3345.960700-25.511719
-0.76%
PAX Gold cryptocurrency
OXT.X0.056600-0.001598
-2.75%
Orchid cryptocurrency
DATA.X0.014281-0.001466
-9.31%
Streamr cryptocurrency
BNX.X374.993930-85.175385
-18.51%
BinaryX [Old] cryptocurrency

AZZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AZZ has been loosely correlated with BCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AZZ jumps, then BCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AZZ
1D Price
Change %
AZZ100%
+2.50%
BCO - AZZ
64%
Loosely correlated
+3.28%
GHC - AZZ
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.98%
MSA - AZZ
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
UTI - AZZ
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.47%
BV - AZZ
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
More

EAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EAT has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EAT jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EAT
1D Price
Change %
EAT100%
+0.76%
CAKE - EAT
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
DRI - EAT
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
TXRH - EAT
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
SHAK - EAT
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.17%
FRSH - EAT
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.85%
More