Advertisement
AZZ vs GHC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZZ is a Buy and GHC is a Buy.
| AZZ | GHC | AZZ / GHC | |
| Capitalization | 3.99B | 4.84B | 82% |
| EBITDA | 401M | 932M | 43% |
| Gain YTD | 25.270 | 4.836 | 523% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.23 | 9.24 | 219% |
| Revenue | 1.68B | 5.07B | 33% |
| Total Cash | 1.06M | 1.25B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 543M | 1.34B | 41% |
AZZ | GHC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 33 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 49 Fair valued | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 55 | 65 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GHC's Valuation (18) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as AZZ (49) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew similarly to AZZ’s over the last 12 months.
AZZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as GHC (15) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that AZZ’s stock grew similarly to GHC’s over the last 12 months.
AZZ's SMR Rating (55) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as GHC (65) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that AZZ’s stock grew similarly to GHC’s over the last 12 months.
GHC's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as AZZ (58) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew similarly to AZZ’s over the last 12 months.
AZZ's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as GHC (22) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that AZZ’s stock grew similarly to GHC’s over the last 12 months.
| AZZ | GHC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 45% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 38% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 58% | 6 days ago 45% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 28% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AZZ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while GHC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- AZZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- GHC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AZZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GHC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AZZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- GHC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AZZ (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а +0.66% price change this week, while GHC (@Industrial Conglomerates) price change was -1.84% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.74%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was +0.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.34%.
Reported Earning Dates
AZZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 13, 2026.
GHC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Office Equipment/Supplies (+0.64% weekly)The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
@Industrial Conglomerates (+0.69% weekly)Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SOXY | 95.42 | 4.79 | +5.29% |
| YieldMax Target 12 Semiconductor Option Income ETF (SOXY) | |||
| BOUT | 43.49 | 0.34 | +0.80% |
| CapForce IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT) | |||
| UFEB | 39.65 | 0.19 | +0.49% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - February (UFEB) | |||
| PCEF | 19.76 | -0.03 | -0.15% |
| Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF) | |||
| PHYS | 32.83 | -0.20 | -0.61% |
| Sprott Physical Gold Trust | |||
AZZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AZZ has been loosely correlated with BCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AZZ jumps, then BCO could also see price increases.