BABAF
Price
$17.78
Change
+$0.63 (+3.67%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
338.52B
KPEA
Price
$0.09
Change
+$0.02 (+28.57%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
36M
Ad is loading...

BABAF vs KPEA

Header iconBABAF vs KPEA Comparison
Open Charts BABAF vs KPEABanner chart's image
Alibaba Group Holding
Price$17.78
Change+$0.63 (+3.67%)
Volume$10.54K
Capitalization338.52B
Kun Peng International
Price$0.09
Change+$0.02 (+28.57%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization36M
BABAF vs KPEA Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BABAF vs. KPEA commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BABAF is a Hold and KPEA is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (BABAF: $17.78 vs. KPEA: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: BABAF and KPEA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BABAF: 20% vs. KPEA: 7%
Market capitalization -- BABAF: $338.52B vs. KPEA: $36M
BABAF [@Internet Retail] is valued at $338.52B. KPEA’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.3T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $44.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BABAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKPEA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BABAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KPEA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BABAF is a better buy in the long-term than KPEA.

Price Growth

BABAF (@Internet Retail) experienced а +15.08% price change this week, while KPEA (@Internet Retail) price change was +39.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was -2.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.77%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (-2.33% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BABAF($339B) has a higher market cap than KPEA($36M). BABAF YTD gains are higher at: 77.445 vs. KPEA (12.500). BABAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 148B vs. KPEA (-210.91K). BABAF has more cash in the bank: 389B vs. KPEA (295K). KPEA has less debt than BABAF: KPEA (659K) vs BABAF (202B). BABAF has higher revenues than KPEA: BABAF (962B) vs KPEA (4.28M).
BABAFKPEABABAF / KPEA
Capitalization339B36M941,667%
EBITDA148B-210.91K-70,173,775%
Gain YTD77.44512.500620%
P/E Ratio20.71N/A-
Revenue962B4.28M22,455,649%
Total Cash389B295K131,864,407%
Total Debt202B659K30,652,504%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KPEA: Fundamental Ratings
KPEA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
78
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
REK16.910.13
+0.79%
ProShares Short Real Estate
PAB42.010.18
+0.44%
PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF
IBDY25.390.09
+0.36%
iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Corp ETF
IHI64.36-0.48
-0.74%
iShares US Medical Devices ETF
FPAG32.07-0.46
-1.41%
FPA Global Equity ETF

KPEA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KPEA and DADA have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KPEA and DADA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KPEA
1D Price
Change %
KPEA100%
+25.87%
DADA - KPEA
3%
Poorly correlated
+3.78%
BHOOY - KPEA
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BHHOF - KPEA
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BABAF - KPEA
-1%
Poorly correlated
+3.67%
BGRP - KPEA
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More