BABAF
Price
$14.15
Change
-$0.41 (-2.82%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
272.23B
KPEA
Price
$0.09
Change
+$0.02 (+28.57%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
36M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BABAF vs KPEA

Header iconBABAF vs KPEA Comparison
Open Charts BABAF vs KPEABanner chart's image
Alibaba Group Holding
Price$14.15
Change-$0.41 (-2.82%)
Volume$761.43K
Capitalization272.23B
Kun Peng International
Price$0.09
Change+$0.02 (+28.57%)
Volume$4K
Capitalization36M
BABAF vs KPEA Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BABAF vs. KPEA commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BABAF is a Hold and KPEA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (BABAF: $14.15 vs. KPEA: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: BABAF and KPEA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BABAF: 392% vs. KPEA: 126%
Market capitalization -- BABAF: $272.23B vs. KPEA: $36M
BABAF [@Internet Retail] is valued at $272.23B. KPEA’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.25T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $44.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BABAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKPEA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BABAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KPEA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BABAF and KPEA are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

BABAF (@Internet Retail) experienced а -3.63% price change this week, while KPEA (@Internet Retail) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +42.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

BABAF is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (-0.34% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BABAF($272B) has a higher market cap than KPEA($36M). BABAF YTD gains are higher at: 43.590 vs. KPEA (12.500). BABAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 169B vs. KPEA (-1.55M). BABAF has higher revenues than KPEA: BABAF (982B) vs KPEA (1.87M).
BABAFKPEABABAF / KPEA
Capitalization272B36M755,556%
EBITDA169B-1.55M-10,892,741%
Gain YTD43.59012.500349%
P/E Ratio15.19N/A-
Revenue982B1.87M52,429,258%
Total CashN/A207K-
Total DebtN/A495K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KPEA: Fundamental Ratings
KPEA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
70
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
77
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JETD10.330.52
+5.26%
MAX Airlines -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
VABS24.430.01
+0.05%
Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF
PSFF29.77-0.12
-0.40%
Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF
EPP49.25-0.52
-1.04%
iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF
GTEK34.08-0.53
-1.52%
Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Eq ETF

KPEA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KPEA and DADA have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KPEA and DADA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KPEA
1D Price
Change %
KPEA100%
N/A
DADA - KPEA
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
BHOOY - KPEA
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BHHOF - KPEA
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BABAF - KPEA
-1%
Poorly correlated
-2.83%
BGRP - KPEA
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More