BABB vs BMBOY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BABB is a Hold and BMBOY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BABB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBMBOY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BABB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- BMBOY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BABB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- BABB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
BABB (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -8.33% price change this week, while BMBOY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +5.38% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.04%.
Reported Earning Dates
BABB is expected to report earnings on Apr 13, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (-1.25% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| BABB | BMBOY | BABB / BMBOY | |
| Capitalization | 5.16M | 23.1B | 0% |
| EBITDA | 611K | 71.7B | 0% |
| Gain YTD | 1.191 | 12.926 | 9% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.85 | 12.39 | 96% |
| Revenue | 3.33M | 408B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 1.68M | 7.19B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 97.6K | 120B | 0% |
BABB | BMBOY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | 48 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 42 | 57 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | 61 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 10 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BABB's Valuation (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BMBOY (48). This means that BABB’s stock grew somewhat faster than BMBOY’s over the last 12 months.
BABB's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as BMBOY (57). This means that BABB’s stock grew similarly to BMBOY’s over the last 12 months.
BABB's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as BMBOY (61). This means that BABB’s stock grew similarly to BMBOY’s over the last 12 months.
BMBOY's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as BABB (55). This means that BMBOY’s stock grew similarly to BABB’s over the last 12 months.
BMBOY's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BABB (53). This means that BMBOY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BABB’s over the last 12 months.
| BABB | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 44% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 61% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SDD | 22.03 | 1.76 | +8.70% |
| ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 | |||
| XTRE | 49.75 | 0.06 | +0.12% |
| BondBloxx Bloomberg ThreeYrTrgDurUSTrETF | |||
| FSYD | 45.68 | -0.83 | -1.79% |
| Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF | |||
| JMEE | 50.84 | -2.46 | -4.62% |
| JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enh Eq ETF | |||
| JSMD | 64.13 | -3.22 | -4.78% |
| Janus Henderson Small/Md Cp Gr Alpha ETF | |||
BABB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BABB and MDLZ have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BABB and MDLZ's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BABB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BABB | 100% | +1.32% | ||
| MDLZ - BABB | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.34% | ||
| HSY - BABB | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.75% | ||
| BRRLY - BABB | 16% Poorly correlated | -6.15% | ||
| ASBFY - BABB | 14% Poorly correlated | -3.19% | ||
| BMBOY - BABB | 7% Poorly correlated | -7.26% | ||
More | ||||
BMBOY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BMBOY and GRBMF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMBOY and GRBMF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BMBOY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMBOY | 100% | -7.26% | ||
| GRBMF - BMBOY | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ASBFY - BMBOY | 9% Poorly correlated | -3.19% | ||
| BABB - BMBOY | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.32% | ||
| BTTR - BMBOY | 6% Poorly correlated | +12.17% | ||
| BFNH - BMBOY | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||