It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BABB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBMBOY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BABB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BMBOY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
BABB (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +12.45% price change this week, while BMBOY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -3.48% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.95%.
BABB is expected to report earnings on Apr 13, 2023.
A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
BABB | BMBOY | BABB / BMBOY | |
Capitalization | 5.16M | 23.1B | 0% |
EBITDA | 611K | 71.7B | 0% |
Gain YTD | 31.047 | -45.104 | -69% |
P/E Ratio | 11.85 | 12.39 | 96% |
Revenue | 3.33M | 408B | 0% |
Total Cash | 1.68M | 7.19B | 0% |
Total Debt | 97.6K | 120B | 0% |
BABB | BMBOY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 68 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | 44 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 62 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | 61 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 81 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 20 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BABB's Valuation (15) in the null industry is in the same range as BMBOY (44). This means that BABB’s stock grew similarly to BMBOY’s over the last 12 months.
BABB's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as BMBOY (62). This means that BABB’s stock grew similarly to BMBOY’s over the last 12 months.
BABB's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as BMBOY (61). This means that BABB’s stock grew similarly to BMBOY’s over the last 12 months.
BABB's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BMBOY (81). This means that BABB’s stock grew somewhat faster than BMBOY’s over the last 12 months.
BMBOY's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BABB (55). This means that BMBOY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BABB’s over the last 12 months.
BABB | BMBOY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago56% | 2 days ago76% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago55% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago62% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 2 days ago54% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago55% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago55% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago43% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago85% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago57% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
FOREX / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
GBPJPY | 195.54 | N/A | N/A |
United Kingdom Pound - Japan Yen | |||
CHFUSD | 1.12 | N/A | N/A |
Switzerland Franc - United States Dollar | |||
AUDNZD | 1.10 | N/A | N/A |
Australian Dollar - New Zealand Dollar | |||
CDL | 65.98 | -0.34 | -0.51% |
VictoryShares US LgCp Hi Div Vol Wtd ETF | |||
XSMO | 69.07 | -1.20 | -1.71% |
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BMBOY and GRBMF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMBOY and GRBMF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BMBOY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BMBOY | 100% | -5.04% | ||
GRBMF - BMBOY | 29% Poorly correlated | -9.15% | ||
ASBFY - BMBOY | 9% Poorly correlated | -2.01% | ||
BABB - BMBOY | 7% Poorly correlated | +3.76% | ||
BTTR - BMBOY | 6% Poorly correlated | -4.72% | ||
BFNH - BMBOY | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |