BAC
Price
$47.05
Change
+$1.03 (+2.24%)
Updated
Jul 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
299.21B
89 days until earnings call
NTIOF
Price
$103.05
Change
+$0.37 (+0.36%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
26.32B
41 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAC vs NTIOF

Header iconBAC vs NTIOF Comparison
Open Charts BAC vs NTIOFBanner chart's image
Bank of America
Price$47.05
Change+$1.03 (+2.24%)
Volume$738.24K
Capitalization299.21B
National Bank of Canada
Price$103.05
Change+$0.37 (+0.36%)
Volume$36.07K
Capitalization26.32B
BAC vs NTIOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NTIOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAC vs. NTIOF commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAC is a Hold and NTIOF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (BAC: $47.02 vs. NTIOF: $103.05)
Brand notoriety: BAC: Notable vs. NTIOF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAC: 139% vs. NTIOF: 24%
Market capitalization -- BAC: $299.21B vs. NTIOF: $26.32B
BAC [@Major Banks] is valued at $299.21B. NTIOF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $26.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNTIOF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BAC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NTIOF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, NTIOF is a better buy in the long-term than BAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTIOF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NTIOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NTIOF is a better buy in the short-term than BAC.

Price Growth

BAC (@Major Banks) experienced а +0.11% price change this week, while NTIOF (@Major Banks) price change was -0.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAC is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

NTIOF is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-1.17% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAC($299B) has a higher market cap than NTIOF($26.3B). BAC has higher P/E ratio than NTIOF: BAC (12.18) vs NTIOF (11.05). NTIOF YTD gains are higher at: 13.105 vs. BAC (8.295). NTIOF has less debt than BAC: NTIOF (47.9B) vs BAC (334B). BAC has higher revenues than NTIOF: BAC (98.6B) vs NTIOF (9.79B).
BACNTIOFBAC / NTIOF
Capitalization299B26.3B1,137%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.29513.10563%
P/E Ratio12.1811.05110%
Revenue98.6B9.79B1,007%
Total Cash25.3BN/A-
Total Debt334B47.9B697%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAC vs NTIOF: Fundamental Ratings
BAC
NTIOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7487
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3618
SMR RATING
1..100
18
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2845
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6429
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5095

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAC's Valuation (76) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as NTIOF (100) in the null industry. This means that BAC’s stock grew similarly to NTIOF’s over the last 12 months.

NTIOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as BAC (36) in the Major Banks industry. This means that NTIOF’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

BAC's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as NTIOF (8) in the null industry. This means that BAC’s stock grew similarly to NTIOF’s over the last 12 months.

BAC's Price Growth Rating (28) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as NTIOF (45) in the null industry. This means that BAC’s stock grew similarly to NTIOF’s over the last 12 months.

NTIOF's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAC (64) in the Major Banks industry. This means that NTIOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BACNTIOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NTIOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STXM27.050.35
+1.30%
Strive Mid-Cap ETF
DURA33.350.28
+0.86%
VanEck Durable High Dividend ETF
JCPI48.040.06
+0.13%
JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF
VMBS45.82-0.01
-0.02%
Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Secs ETF
BSMT22.75-0.03
-0.15%
Invesco BulletShares 2029 Muncpl Bd ETF

BAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAC has been closely correlated with WFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAC jumps, then WFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAC
1D Price
Change %
BAC100%
+2.15%
WFC - BAC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.25%
C - BAC
84%
Closely correlated
+3.41%
JPM - BAC
82%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
BMO - BAC
70%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
EWBC - BAC
68%
Closely correlated
+2.57%
More

NTIOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTIOF has been loosely correlated with RY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NTIOF jumps, then RY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTIOF
1D Price
Change %
NTIOF100%
+0.36%
RY - NTIOF
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.03%
BAC - NTIOF
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
CM - NTIOF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.76%
NTB - NTIOF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
JPM - NTIOF
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
More