Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACAX vs FAGNX
BACAX vs FAGNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACAX vs. FAGNX commentary
Oct 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACAX is a Hold and FAGNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 944M vs. BACAX (263M). BACAX pays higher dividends than FAGNX: BACAX (2.21) vs FAGNX (0.74). BACAX was incepted earlier than FAGNX: BACAX (21 years) vs FAGNX (38 years). BACAX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FAGNX (1.23). BACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FAGNX (15.00). BACAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FAGNX (4%) vs FAGNX (4%). FAGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACAX: FAGNX (0) vs BACAX (1000). BACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.34 vs. FAGNX (0.20). FAGNX return over 5 years is better than : 253.02 vs. BACAX (186.37).
| BACAX | FAGNX | BACAX / FAGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.23 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.23 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.463 | 7.640 | 98% |
| Front Load | 5% | 4% | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 263M | 944M | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.21 | 0.74 | 298% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.34 | 0.20 | 168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.04 | 22.30 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 186.37 | 253.02 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.28 | 68.99 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement