Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACAX vs FAGNX
BACAX vs FAGNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACAX vs. FAGNX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACAX is a Hold and FAGNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 895M vs. BACAX (274M). BACAX pays higher dividends than FAGNX: BACAX (2.23) vs FAGNX (0.75). BACAX was incepted earlier than FAGNX: BACAX (21 years) vs FAGNX (38 years). BACAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FAGNX (1.23). BACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FAGNX (15.00). BACAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FAGNX (4%) vs FAGNX (4%). FAGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACAX: FAGNX (0) vs BACAX (1000). FAGNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.72 vs. BACAX (3.25). FAGNX return over 5 years is better than : 216.91 vs. BACAX (155.25).
| BACAX | FAGNX | BACAX / FAGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.23 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.23 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.371 | 12.360 | 92% |
| Front Load | 5% | 4% | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 274M | 895M | 31% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.23 | 0.75 | 298% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.25 | 4.72 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.65 | 11.91 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 155.25 | 216.91 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.04 | 79.37 | 91% |