Ad is loading...
BACAX vs FAGNX
BACAX vs FAGNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACAX vs. FAGNX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACAX is a Buy and FAGNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 1.14B vs. BACAX (300M). BACAX pays higher dividends than FAGNX: BACAX (2.76) vs FAGNX (1.49). BACAX was incepted earlier than FAGNX: BACAX (20 years) vs FAGNX (37 years). BACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FAGNX (21.00). FAGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACAX: FAGNX (0) vs BACAX (1000). BACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.13 vs. FAGNX (4.40). FAGNX return over 5 years is better than : 105.43 vs. BACAX (75.85).
| BACAX | FAGNX | BACAX / FAGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.944 | 4.008 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 300M | 1.14B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.76 | 1.49 | 185% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.13 | 4.40 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.67 | 46.17 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.85 | 105.43 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.73 | 41.08 | 68% |