Ad is loading...
BACAX vs FAGNX
BACAX vs FAGNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACAX vs. FAGNX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACAX is a Buy and FAGNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 1.08B vs. BACAX (252M). BACAX pays higher dividends than FAGNX: BACAX (2.11) vs FAGNX (0.77). BACAX was incepted earlier than FAGNX: BACAX (20 years) vs FAGNX (37 years). BACAX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FAGNX (1.23). BACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FAGNX (31.00). BACAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FAGNX (4%) vs FAGNX (4%). FAGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACAX: FAGNX (0) vs BACAX (1000). BACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -18.40 vs. FAGNX (-25.93). FAGNX return over 5 years is better than : 172.25 vs. BACAX (123.98).
| BACAX | FAGNX | BACAX / FAGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.23 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.23 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.822 | -14.836 | 66% |
| Front Load | 5% | 4% | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 252M | 1.08B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.11 | 0.77 | 275% |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.40 | -25.93 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.15 | -1.31 | -240% |
| Returns for 5 years | 123.98 | 172.25 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.15 | 13.24 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...