Ad is loading...
BACAX vs FIKAX
BACAX vs FIKAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACAX vs. FIKAX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACAX is a Buy and FIKAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.08B vs. BACAX (252M). BACAX pays higher dividends than FIKAX: BACAX (2.11) vs FIKAX (0.99). BACAX was incepted earlier than FIKAX: BACAX (20 years) vs FIKAX (7 years). BACAX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FIKAX (0.58). BACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FIKAX (31.00). FIKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACAX: FIKAX (0) vs BACAX (1000). BACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -18.40 vs. FIKAX (-25.45). FIKAX return over 5 years is better than : 181.47 vs. BACAX (123.98).
| BACAX | FIKAX | BACAX / FIKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.58 | 228% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.58 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.822 | -14.675 | 67% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 252M | 1.08B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.11 | 0.99 | 212% |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.40 | -25.45 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.15 | 0.63 | 497% |
| Returns for 5 years | 123.98 | 181.47 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.15 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers