Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACCX vs FAGNX
BACCX vs FAGNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACCX vs. FAGNX commentary
Jul 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACCX is a Buy and FAGNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 931M vs. BACCX (281M). BACCX pays higher dividends than FAGNX: BACCX (1.64) vs FAGNX (0.80). BACCX was incepted earlier than FAGNX: BACCX (20 years) vs FAGNX (38 years). BACCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FAGNX (1.23). BACCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FAGNX (31.00). FAGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACCX: FAGNX (0) vs BACCX (1000). BACCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.39 vs. FAGNX (-1.45). FAGNX return over 5 years is better than : 211.14 vs. BACCX (147.46).
| BACCX | FAGNX | BACCX / FAGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 1.23 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.23 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.988 | 5.713 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 281M | 931M | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.64 | 0.80 | 206% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.39 | -1.45 | -96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.67 | 41.89 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 147.46 | 211.14 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.78 | 52.84 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement