Ad is loading...
BACCX vs FAGNX
BACCX vs FAGNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACCX vs. FAGNX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACCX is a StrongBuy and FAGNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 1.08B vs. BACCX (270M). BACCX pays higher dividends than FAGNX: BACCX (1.57) vs FAGNX (0.77). BACCX was incepted earlier than FAGNX: BACCX (20 years) vs FAGNX (37 years). BACCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FAGNX (1.23). BACCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FAGNX (31.00). FAGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACCX: FAGNX (0) vs BACCX (1000). BACCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.44 vs. FAGNX (-18.06). FAGNX return over 5 years is better than : 188.80 vs. BACCX (135.25).
| BACCX | FAGNX | BACCX / FAGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 1.23 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.23 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.052 | -7.728 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 270M | 1.08B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 0.77 | 205% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.44 | -18.06 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.48 | 11.22 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 135.25 | 188.80 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.65 | 20.52 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...