Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACCX vs FAGNX
BACCX vs FAGNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACCX vs. FAGNX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACCX is a Hold and FAGNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 895M vs. BACCX (272M). BACCX pays higher dividends than FAGNX: BACCX (1.67) vs FAGNX (0.75). BACCX was incepted earlier than FAGNX: BACCX (21 years) vs FAGNX (38 years). BACCX (2.01) is less costly to investors than FAGNX (1.23). BACCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FAGNX (15.00). FAGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACCX: FAGNX (0) vs BACCX (1000). FAGNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.53 vs. BACCX (1.57). FAGNX return over 5 years is better than : 215.11 vs. BACCX (144.99).
| BACCX | FAGNX | BACCX / FAGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 1.23 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 1.23 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.986 | 12.360 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 272M | 895M | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 0.75 | 223% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.57 | 4.53 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.55 | 11.91 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 144.99 | 215.11 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.53 | 79.37 | 76% |