Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACCX vs FAGNX
BACCX vs FAGNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACCX vs. FAGNX commentary
Jun 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACCX is a Hold and FAGNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 897M vs. BACCX (265M). BACCX pays higher dividends than FAGNX: BACCX (1.73) vs FAGNX (0.84). BACCX was incepted earlier than FAGNX: BACCX (20 years) vs FAGNX (37 years). BACCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FAGNX (1.23). BACCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FAGNX (31.00). FAGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACCX: FAGNX (0) vs BACCX (1000). BACCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.77 vs. FAGNX (-11.67). FAGNX return over 5 years is better than : 166.37 vs. BACCX (117.74).
| BACCX | FAGNX | BACCX / FAGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 1.23 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.23 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.767 | -4.318 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 265M | 897M | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.73 | 0.84 | 206% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.77 | -11.67 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.09 | 0.57 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 117.74 | 166.37 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.86 | 29.36 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement