Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACCX vs FAGNX
BACCX vs FAGNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACCX vs. FAGNX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACCX is a Hold and FAGNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 944M vs. BACCX (274M). BACCX pays higher dividends than FAGNX: BACCX (1.66) vs FAGNX (0.74). BACCX was incepted earlier than FAGNX: BACCX (21 years) vs FAGNX (38 years). BACCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FAGNX (1.23). BACCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FAGNX (31.00). FAGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACCX: FAGNX (0) vs BACCX (1000). FAGNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.55 vs. BACCX (2.18). FAGNX return over 5 years is better than : 257.02 vs. BACCX (180.67).
| BACCX | FAGNX | BACCX / FAGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 1.23 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.23 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.529 | 8.857 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 274M | 944M | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 0.74 | 223% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.18 | 2.55 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.57 | 19.67 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 180.67 | 257.02 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.74 | 66.40 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement