Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACCX vs FANIX
BACCX vs FANIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACCX vs. FANIX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACCX is a Hold and FANIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FANIX has more cash in the bank: 944M vs. BACCX (274M). BACCX pays higher dividends than FANIX: BACCX (1.66) vs FANIX (0.90). BACCX was incepted earlier than FANIX: BACCX (21 years) vs FANIX (30 years). BACCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FANIX (0.71). BACCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FANIX (31.00). FANIX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACCX: FANIX (0) vs BACCX (1000). FANIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.07 vs. BACCX (2.18). FANIX return over 5 years is better than : 266.74 vs. BACCX (180.67).
| BACCX | FANIX | BACCX / FANIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 0.71 | 287% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.71 | 296% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.529 | 9.299 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 274M | 944M | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 0.90 | 184% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.18 | 3.07 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.57 | 21.55 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 180.67 | 266.74 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.74 | 71.44 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement