Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACCX vs FANIX
BACCX vs FANIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACCX vs. FANIX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACCX is a Hold and FANIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FANIX has more cash in the bank: 895M vs. BACCX (272M). BACCX pays higher dividends than FANIX: BACCX (1.67) vs FANIX (0.91). BACCX was incepted earlier than FANIX: BACCX (21 years) vs FANIX (30 years). BACCX (2.01) is less costly to investors than FANIX (0.71). BACCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FANIX (15.00). FANIX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACCX: FANIX (0) vs BACCX (1000). FANIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.06 vs. BACCX (1.57). FANIX return over 5 years is better than : 223.72 vs. BACCX (144.99).
| BACCX | FANIX | BACCX / FANIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.71 | 283% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.71 | 283% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.986 | 12.889 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 272M | 895M | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 0.91 | 184% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.57 | 5.06 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.55 | 13.68 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 144.99 | 223.72 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.53 | 84.75 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement