Ad is loading...
BACCX vs FIKAX
BACCX vs FIKAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACCX vs. FIKAX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACCX is a StrongBuy and FIKAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.08B vs. BACCX (270M). BACCX pays higher dividends than FIKAX: BACCX (1.57) vs FIKAX (0.99). BACCX was incepted earlier than FIKAX: BACCX (20 years) vs FIKAX (7 years). BACCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FIKAX (0.58). BACCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FIKAX (31.00). FIKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACCX: FIKAX (0) vs BACCX (1000). BACCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.44 vs. FIKAX (-17.53). FIKAX return over 5 years is better than : 198.63 vs. BACCX (135.25).
| BACCX | FIKAX | BACCX / FIKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 0.58 | 352% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.58 | 362% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.052 | -7.531 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 270M | 1.08B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 0.99 | 158% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.44 | -17.53 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.48 | 13.42 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 135.25 | 198.63 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.65 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...