Ad is loading...
BACCX vs FIKAX
BACCX vs FIKAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACCX vs. FIKAX commentary
Jan 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACCX is a StrongBuy and FIKAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.12B vs. BACCX (307M). BACCX pays higher dividends than FIKAX: BACCX (2.17) vs FIKAX (1.99). BACCX was incepted earlier than FIKAX: BACCX (20 years) vs FIKAX (6 years). BACCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FIKAX (21.00). FIKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACCX: FIKAX (0) vs BACCX (1000). FIKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.96 vs. BACCX (4.41). FIKAX return over 5 years is better than : 83.29 vs. BACCX (49.82).
| BACCX | FIKAX | BACCX / FIKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.249 | 2.188 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 307M | 1.12B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.17 | 1.99 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.41 | 5.96 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.94 | 64.22 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.82 | 83.29 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.09 | N/A | - |