Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACCX vs FIKAX
BACCX vs FIKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACCX vs. FIKAX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACCX is a Buy and FIKAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIKAX has more cash in the bank: 942M vs. BACCX (273M). BACCX pays higher dividends than FIKAX: BACCX (1.71) vs FIKAX (1.00). BACCX was incepted earlier than FIKAX: BACCX (21 years) vs FIKAX (7 years). BACCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FIKAX (0.58). BACCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIKAX (31.00). FIKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACCX: FIKAX (0) vs BACCX (1000). FIKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.56 vs. BACCX (-0.11). FIKAX return over 5 years is better than : 209.86 vs. BACCX (139.07).
| BACCX | FIKAX | BACCX / FIKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 0.58 | 352% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.58 | 362% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.101 | 6.200 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 273M | 942M | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.71 | 1.00 | 171% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.11 | 0.56 | -19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.58 | 18.11 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 139.07 | 209.86 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.18 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement