Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACCX vs FIKAX
BACCX vs FIKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACCX vs. FIKAX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACCX is a Hold and FIKAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIKAX has more cash in the bank: 944M vs. BACCX (274M). BACCX pays higher dividends than FIKAX: BACCX (1.66) vs FIKAX (0.96). BACCX was incepted earlier than FIKAX: BACCX (21 years) vs FIKAX (7 years). BACCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FIKAX (0.58). BACCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIKAX (31.00). FIKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACCX: FIKAX (0) vs BACCX (1000). FIKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.22 vs. BACCX (2.18). FIKAX return over 5 years is better than : 269.10 vs. BACCX (180.67).
| BACCX | FIKAX | BACCX / FIKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 0.58 | 352% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.58 | 362% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.529 | 9.419 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 274M | 944M | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 0.96 | 173% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.18 | 3.22 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.57 | 22.02 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 180.67 | 269.10 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.74 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement