Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACCX vs VENAX
BACCX vs VENAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACCX vs. VENAX commentary
Jun 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACCX is a Hold and VENAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VENAX has more cash in the bank: 8.09B vs. BACCX (265M). VENAX pays higher dividends than BACCX: VENAX (3.43) vs BACCX (1.73). BACCX was incepted earlier than VENAX: BACCX (20 years) vs VENAX (21 years). BACCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than VENAX (0.09). BACCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. VENAX (8.00). BACCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VENAX: BACCX (1000) vs VENAX (100000). BACCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.77 vs. VENAX (-9.69). VENAX return over 5 years is better than : 124.95 vs. BACCX (117.74).
| BACCX | VENAX | BACCX / VENAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 0.09 | 2,267% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.09 | 2,333% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.767 | -5.685 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 265M | 8.09B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.73 | 3.43 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.77 | -9.69 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.09 | -4.76 | -23% |
| Returns for 5 years | 117.74 | 124.95 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.86 | 3.75 | 423% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement