BACHF
Price
$0.53
Change
-$0.03 (-5.36%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
230.82B
BCMXY
Price
$22.07
Change
-$0.02 (-0.09%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
84.71B
48 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BACHF vs BCMXY

Header iconBACHF vs BCMXY Comparison
Open Charts BACHF vs BCMXYBanner chart's image
Bank of China
Price$0.53
Change-$0.03 (-5.36%)
Volume$3.88K
Capitalization230.82B
Bank of Communications
Price$22.07
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
Volume$366
Capitalization84.71B
BACHF vs BCMXY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BACHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BCMXY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BACHF vs. BCMXY commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACHF is a Hold and BCMXY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BACHF: $0.53 vs. BCMXY: $22.08)
Brand notoriety: BACHF and BCMXY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BACHF: 24% vs. BCMXY: 96%
Market capitalization -- BACHF: $230.82B vs. BCMXY: $84.71B
BACHF [@Major Banks] is valued at $230.82B. BCMXY’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $84.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $809.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $131.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BACHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBCMXY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BACHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BCMXY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BACHF and BCMXY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BACHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BCMXY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BACHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BCMXY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BACHF and BCMXY are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BACHF (@Major Banks) experienced а -3.84% price change this week, while BCMXY (@Major Banks) price change was -0.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +128.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCMXY is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.01% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BACHF($231B) has a higher market cap than BCMXY($84.7B). BCMXY has higher P/E ratio than BACHF: BCMXY (5.30) vs BACHF (5.04). BCMXY YTD gains are higher at: 22.173 vs. BACHF (11.795). BCMXY has less debt than BACHF: BCMXY (1.19T) vs BACHF (2.39T). BACHF has higher revenues than BCMXY: BACHF (633B) vs BCMXY (258B).
BACHFBCMXYBACHF / BCMXY
Capitalization231B84.7B273%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.79522.17353%
P/E Ratio5.045.3095%
Revenue633B258B245%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt2.39T1.19T200%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BACHF vs BCMXY: Fundamental Ratings
BACHF
BCMXY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5094
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3511
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6051
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3633
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BACHF's Valuation (90) in the null industry is in the same range as BCMXY (92). This means that BACHF’s stock grew similarly to BCMXY’s over the last 12 months.

BCMXY's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHF (35). This means that BCMXY’s stock grew similarly to BACHF’s over the last 12 months.

BCMXY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHF (1). This means that BCMXY’s stock grew similarly to BACHF’s over the last 12 months.

BCMXY's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHF (60). This means that BCMXY’s stock grew similarly to BACHF’s over the last 12 months.

BCMXY's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHF (36). This means that BCMXY’s stock grew similarly to BACHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BACHFBCMXY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
23%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BACHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BCMXY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NEXT10.690.23
+2.20%
NextDecade Corp
LXU8.370.17
+2.07%
LSB Industries
OST1.660.02
+1.22%
Ostin Technology Group Co Ltd
EC9.080.04
+0.44%
Ecopetrol SA
GRYP6.90N/A
N/A
Gryphon Digital Mining

BACHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BACHF and IDCBY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BACHF and IDCBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BACHF
1D Price
Change %
BACHF100%
-5.55%
IDCBY - BACHF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
BACHY - BACHF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
CICHY - BACHF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
SMFNF - BACHF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
BBVXF - BACHF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.45%
More

BCMXY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BCMXY and EFGIF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCMXY and EFGIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCMXY
1D Price
Change %
BCMXY100%
-0.11%
EFGIF - BCMXY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BACHF - BCMXY
13%
Poorly correlated
-5.55%
BACHY - BCMXY
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
ACGBY - BCMXY
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
AGRPF - BCMXY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More