BACHF
Price
$0.60
Change
+$0.03 (+5.26%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
228.64B
BCSO
Price
$52.00
Change
-$5.00 (-8.77%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
70.33M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BACHF vs BCSO

Header iconBACHF vs BCSO Comparison
Open Charts BACHF vs BCSOBanner chart's image
Bank of China
Price$0.60
Change+$0.03 (+5.26%)
Volume$4.43K
Capitalization228.64B
Bancorp Southern Indiana
Price$52.00
Change-$5.00 (-8.77%)
Volume$212
Capitalization70.33M
BACHF vs BCSO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BACHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BACHF vs. BCSO commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACHF is a Buy and BCSO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (BACHF: $0.60 vs. BCSO: $52.00)
Brand notoriety: BACHF and BCSO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BACHF: 18% vs. BCSO: 194%
Market capitalization -- BACHF: $228.64B vs. BCSO: $70.33M
BACHF [@Major Banks] is valued at $228.64B. BCSO’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $70.33M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $798.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $130.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BACHF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileBCSO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BACHF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • BCSO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BACHF is a better buy in the long-term than BCSO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BACHF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BACHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BACHF (@Major Banks) experienced а +5.26% price change this week, while BCSO (@Major Banks) price change was -12.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +2.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+2.71% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BACHF($229B) has a higher market cap than BCSO($70.3M). BCSO has higher P/E ratio than BACHF: BCSO (10.42) vs BACHF (5.74). BACHF YTD gains are higher at: 26.823 vs. BCSO (11.869). BACHF has higher revenues than BCSO: BACHF (633B) vs BCSO (39.5M).
BACHFBCSOBACHF / BCSO
Capitalization229B70.3M325,747%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD26.82311.869226%
P/E Ratio5.7410.4255%
Revenue633B39.5M1,602,532%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt2.39TN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BACHF vs BCSO: Fundamental Ratings
BACHF
BCSO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1797
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1938
SMR RATING
1..100
161
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4862
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2857
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCSO's Valuation (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BACHF (92). This means that BCSO’s stock grew somewhat faster than BACHF’s over the last 12 months.

BACHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as BCSO (38). This means that BACHF’s stock grew similarly to BCSO’s over the last 12 months.

BACHF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCSO (61). This means that BACHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCSO’s over the last 12 months.

BACHF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as BCSO (62). This means that BACHF’s stock grew similarly to BCSO’s over the last 12 months.

BACHF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as BCSO (57). This means that BACHF’s stock grew similarly to BCSO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BACHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BACHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FEOE43.810.15
+0.34%
FIRST EAGLE OVERSEAS EQUITY ETF
DJAN41.31-0.06
-0.15%
FT Vest US Equity Dp Bffr ETF Jan
RIET9.45-0.02
-0.25%
Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF
XHB113.34-0.32
-0.28%
SPDR® S&P Homebuilders ETF
AETH53.95-2.04
-3.64%
Bitwise Trendwise Eth & TreasRotStgyETF

BACHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BACHF and IDCBY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BACHF and IDCBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BACHF
1D Price
Change %
BACHF100%
N/A
IDCBY - BACHF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.26%
BACHY - BACHF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
CICHY - BACHF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.93%
SMFNF - BACHF
22%
Poorly correlated
+7.37%
BBVXF - BACHF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.64%
More

BCSO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BCSO and ACGBY have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCSO and ACGBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCSO
1D Price
Change %
BCSO100%
N/A
ACGBY - BCSO
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.00%
BBVXF - BCSO
0%
Poorly correlated
+2.64%
AGRPF - BCSO
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BACHF - BCSO
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BCMXY - BCSO
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More