BACHF
Price
$0.58
Change
+$0.01 (+1.75%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
146.84B
IDCBY
Price
$13.33
Change
-$0.68 (-4.85%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
223.08B
19 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BACHF vs IDCBY

Header iconBACHF vs IDCBY Comparison
Open Charts BACHF vs IDCBYBanner chart's image
Bank of China
Price$0.58
Change+$0.01 (+1.75%)
Volume$18.39K
Capitalization146.84B
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China
Price$13.33
Change-$0.68 (-4.85%)
Volume$60.54K
Capitalization223.08B
BACHF vs IDCBY Comparison Chart
Loading...
IDCBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BACHF vs. IDCBY commentary
Apr 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACHF is a Hold and IDCBY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BACHF: $0.58 vs. IDCBY: $13.33)
Brand notoriety: BACHF and IDCBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BACHF: 52% vs. IDCBY: 159%
Market capitalization -- BACHF: $146.84B vs. IDCBY: $223.08B
BACHF [@Major Banks] is valued at $146.84B. IDCBY’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $223.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BACHF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileIDCBY’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • BACHF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • IDCBY’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BACHF and IDCBY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IDCBY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • IDCBY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BACHF (@Major Banks) experienced а +5.00% price change this week, while IDCBY (@Major Banks) price change was -5.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +57.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +57.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

IDCBY is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+57.67% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IDCBY($223B) has a higher market cap than BACHF($147B). BACHF (3.61) and IDCBY (3.51) have similar P/E ratio . BACHF YTD gains are higher at: 23.441 vs. IDCBY (3.627). IDCBY has higher revenues than BACHF: IDCBY (911B) vs BACHF (635B).
BACHFIDCBYBACHF / IDCBY
Capitalization147B223B66%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.4413.627646%
P/E Ratio3.613.51103%
Revenue635B911B70%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.77TN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BACHF vs IDCBY: Fundamental Ratings
BACHF
IDCBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1925
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4044
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1214
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IDCBY's Valuation (15) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHF (18). This means that IDCBY’s stock grew similarly to BACHF’s over the last 12 months.

BACHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as IDCBY (25). This means that BACHF’s stock grew similarly to IDCBY’s over the last 12 months.

BACHF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as IDCBY (1). This means that BACHF’s stock grew similarly to IDCBY’s over the last 12 months.

BACHF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as IDCBY (44). This means that BACHF’s stock grew similarly to IDCBY’s over the last 12 months.

BACHF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as IDCBY (14). This means that BACHF’s stock grew similarly to IDCBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IDCBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
IDCBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JDST19.643.15
+19.10%
Direxion Daily Jr Gld Mnrs Bear 2X ETF
EMBD22.31-0.44
-1.93%
Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF
QAI30.12-0.84
-2.71%
NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF
SUPP53.12-3.21
-5.70%
TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF
XBI73.66-4.48
-5.73%
SPDR® S&P Biotech ETF

BACHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BACHF and IDCBY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BACHF and IDCBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BACHF
1D Price
Change %
BACHF100%
+2.46%
IDCBY - BACHF
26%
Poorly correlated
-4.82%
BACHY - BACHF
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.63%
CICHY - BACHF
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.31%
SMFNF - BACHF
22%
Poorly correlated
-9.47%
BBVXF - BACHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IDCBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IDCBY has been closely correlated with CICHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IDCBY jumps, then CICHY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IDCBY
1D Price
Change %
IDCBY100%
-4.82%
CICHY - IDCBY
91%
Closely correlated
-4.31%
BACHY - IDCBY
81%
Closely correlated
-4.63%
ACGBY - IDCBY
78%
Closely correlated
-3.63%
SCBFY - IDCBY
33%
Loosely correlated
-7.20%
HSBC - IDCBY
27%
Poorly correlated
-6.84%
More