BACHF
Price
$0.57
Change
+$0.02 (+3.64%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
231.91B
IDCBY
Price
$14.67
Change
-$0.22 (-1.48%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
345.18B
53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BACHF vs IDCBY

Header iconBACHF vs IDCBY Comparison
Open Charts BACHF vs IDCBYBanner chart's image
Bank of China
Price$0.57
Change+$0.02 (+3.64%)
Volume$570
Capitalization231.91B
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China
Price$14.67
Change-$0.22 (-1.48%)
Volume$32.63K
Capitalization345.18B
BACHF vs IDCBY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BACHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IDCBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BACHF vs. IDCBY commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACHF is a StrongBuy and IDCBY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (BACHF: $0.57 vs. IDCBY: $14.67)
Brand notoriety: BACHF and IDCBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BACHF: 3% vs. IDCBY: 70%
Market capitalization -- BACHF: $231.91B vs. IDCBY: $345.18B
BACHF [@Major Banks] is valued at $231.91B. IDCBY’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $345.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $823.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $131.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BACHF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileIDCBY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BACHF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • IDCBY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BACHF and IDCBY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BACHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IDCBY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BACHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • IDCBY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BACHF is a better buy in the short-term than IDCBY.

Price Growth

BACHF (@Major Banks) experienced а +0.81% price change this week, while IDCBY (@Major Banks) price change was -0.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +128.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

IDCBY is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+0.11% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IDCBY($345B) has a higher market cap than BACHF($232B). BACHF (5.47) and IDCBY (5.39) have similar P/E ratio . BACHF YTD gains are higher at: 21.539 vs. IDCBY (17.386). IDCBY has higher revenues than BACHF: IDCBY (810B) vs BACHF (633B).
BACHFIDCBYBACHF / IDCBY
Capitalization232B345B67%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD21.53917.386124%
P/E Ratio5.475.39101%
Revenue633B810B78%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt2.39TN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BACHF vs IDCBY: Fundamental Ratings
BACHF
IDCBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5358
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2120
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5751
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3020
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IDCBY's Valuation (67) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHF (91). This means that IDCBY’s stock grew similarly to BACHF’s over the last 12 months.

IDCBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHF (21). This means that IDCBY’s stock grew similarly to BACHF’s over the last 12 months.

IDCBY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHF (1). This means that IDCBY’s stock grew similarly to BACHF’s over the last 12 months.

IDCBY's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHF (57). This means that IDCBY’s stock grew similarly to BACHF’s over the last 12 months.

IDCBY's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHF (30). This means that IDCBY’s stock grew similarly to BACHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BACHFIDCBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BACHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IDCBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRME3.340.22
+7.05%
Prime Medicine
CWT46.460.42
+0.91%
California Water Service
GEN29.660.16
+0.54%
Gen Digital
SEER2.02-0.02
-0.98%
Seer
LUCY1.89-0.04
-2.32%
Innovative Eyewear Inc.

BACHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BACHF and IDCBY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BACHF and IDCBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BACHF
1D Price
Change %
BACHF100%
N/A
IDCBY - BACHF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.48%
BACHY - BACHF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
CICHY - BACHF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
SMFNF - BACHF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.10%
BBVXF - BACHF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
More

IDCBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IDCBY has been closely correlated with CICHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IDCBY jumps, then CICHY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IDCBY
1D Price
Change %
IDCBY100%
-1.48%
CICHY - IDCBY
91%
Closely correlated
-1.00%
BACHY - IDCBY
81%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
ACGBY - IDCBY
78%
Closely correlated
-1.20%
SCBFY - IDCBY
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
HSBC - IDCBY
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
More