BACHF
Price
$0.58
Change
+$0.01 (+1.75%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
146.84B
SMFNF
Price
$20.32
Change
-$2.12 (-9.44%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
61.94B
Ad is loading...

BACHF vs SMFNF

Header iconBACHF vs SMFNF Comparison
Open Charts BACHF vs SMFNFBanner chart's image
Bank of China
Price$0.58
Change+$0.01 (+1.75%)
Volume$18.39K
Capitalization146.84B
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group
Price$20.32
Change-$2.12 (-9.44%)
Volume$36.11K
Capitalization61.94B
BACHF vs SMFNF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BACHF vs. SMFNF commentary
Apr 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACHF is a Hold and SMFNF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BACHF: $0.58 vs. SMFNF: $20.33)
Brand notoriety: BACHF and SMFNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BACHF: 52% vs. SMFNF: 0%
Market capitalization -- BACHF: $146.84B vs. SMFNF: $61.94B
BACHF [@Major Banks] is valued at $146.84B. SMFNF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $61.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BACHF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileSMFNF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BACHF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • SMFNF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, BACHF is a better buy in the long-term than SMFNF.

Price Growth

BACHF (@Major Banks) experienced а +5.00% price change this week, while SMFNF (@Major Banks) price change was -24.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +57.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +57.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.81%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+57.67% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BACHF($147B) has a higher market cap than SMFNF($61.9B). SMFNF has higher P/E ratio than BACHF: SMFNF (10.93) vs BACHF (3.61). BACHF YTD gains are higher at: 23.441 vs. SMFNF (-10.066). BACHF has less debt than SMFNF: BACHF (1.77T) vs SMFNF (29.38T). SMFNF has higher revenues than BACHF: SMFNF (3.72T) vs BACHF (635B).
BACHFSMFNFBACHF / SMFNF
Capitalization147B61.9B237%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.441-10.066-233%
P/E Ratio3.6110.9333%
Revenue635B3.72T17%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.77T29.38T6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BACHF vs SMFNF: Fundamental Ratings
BACHF
SMFNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1927
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4062
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1282
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BACHF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as SMFNF (32). This means that BACHF’s stock grew similarly to SMFNF’s over the last 12 months.

BACHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as SMFNF (27). This means that BACHF’s stock grew similarly to SMFNF’s over the last 12 months.

BACHF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as SMFNF (1). This means that BACHF’s stock grew similarly to SMFNF’s over the last 12 months.

BACHF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as SMFNF (62). This means that BACHF’s stock grew similarly to SMFNF’s over the last 12 months.

BACHF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SMFNF (82). This means that BACHF’s stock grew significantly faster than SMFNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TOTL40.410.02
+0.05%
SPDR® DoubleLine® Total Return Tact ETF
BUYW12.91-0.53
-3.94%
Main BuyWrite ETF
GXLM27.00-1.50
-5.26%
Grayscale Stellar Lumens Trust (XLM)
TDV63.90-4.26
-6.25%
ProShares S&PTech Div Arstcrts ETF
PSMJ26.25-1.78
-6.35%
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

BACHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BACHF and IDCBY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BACHF and IDCBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BACHF
1D Price
Change %
BACHF100%
+2.46%
IDCBY - BACHF
26%
Poorly correlated
-4.82%
BACHY - BACHF
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.63%
CICHY - BACHF
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.31%
SMFNF - BACHF
22%
Poorly correlated
-9.47%
BBVXF - BACHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SMFNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMFNF has been loosely correlated with SMFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMFNF jumps, then SMFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMFNF
1D Price
Change %
SMFNF100%
-9.47%
SMFG - SMFNF
39%
Loosely correlated
-8.55%
MUFG - SMFNF
33%
Poorly correlated
-8.60%
CMWAY - SMFNF
25%
Poorly correlated
-6.99%
HBCYF - SMFNF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.75%
BACHF - SMFNF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.46%
More