BACHF
Price
$0.58
Change
-$0.01 (-1.69%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
146.84B
SMFNF
Price
$24.75
Change
-$0.13 (-0.52%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
61.94B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BACHF vs SMFNF

Header iconBACHF vs SMFNF Comparison
Open Charts BACHF vs SMFNFBanner chart's image
Bank of China
Price$0.58
Change-$0.01 (-1.69%)
Volume$11.6K
Capitalization146.84B
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group
Price$24.75
Change-$0.13 (-0.52%)
Volume$7
Capitalization61.94B
BACHF vs SMFNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BACHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BACHF vs. SMFNF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACHF is a Buy and SMFNF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BACHF: $0.58 vs. SMFNF: $24.75)
Brand notoriety: BACHF and SMFNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BACHF: 49% vs. SMFNF: 0%
Market capitalization -- BACHF: $146.84B vs. SMFNF: $61.94B
BACHF [@Major Banks] is valued at $146.84B. SMFNF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $61.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BACHF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSMFNF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BACHF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SMFNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BACHF is a better buy in the long-term than SMFNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BACHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMFNF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BACHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SMFNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BACHF is a better buy in the short-term than SMFNF.

Price Growth

BACHF (@Major Banks) experienced а -1.93% price change this week, while SMFNF (@Major Banks) price change was +0.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

BACHF is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.53% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BACHF($147B) has a higher market cap than SMFNF($61.9B). SMFNF has higher P/E ratio than BACHF: SMFNF (10.93) vs BACHF (3.61). BACHF YTD gains are higher at: 22.596 vs. SMFNF (9.513). BACHF has less debt than SMFNF: BACHF (1.77T) vs SMFNF (29.38T). SMFNF has higher revenues than BACHF: SMFNF (3.72T) vs BACHF (635B).
BACHFSMFNFBACHF / SMFNF
Capitalization147B61.9B237%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD22.5969.513238%
P/E Ratio3.6110.9333%
Revenue635B3.72T17%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.77T29.38T6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BACHF vs SMFNF: Fundamental Ratings
BACHF
SMFNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5096
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2324
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5453
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4380
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BACHF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is in the same range as SMFNF (44). This means that BACHF’s stock grew similarly to SMFNF’s over the last 12 months.

BACHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the null industry is in the same range as SMFNF (24). This means that BACHF’s stock grew similarly to SMFNF’s over the last 12 months.

BACHF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as SMFNF (1). This means that BACHF’s stock grew similarly to SMFNF’s over the last 12 months.

SMFNF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHF (54). This means that SMFNF’s stock grew similarly to BACHF’s over the last 12 months.

BACHF's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMFNF (80). This means that BACHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMFNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BACHFSMFNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BACHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSLR185.0314.51
+8.51%
First Solar
IMRN1.770.07
+4.41%
Immuron Limited
PLX1.540.04
+2.67%
Protalix BioTherapeutics
CCAP14.330.10
+0.70%
Crescent Capital BDC
GBDC14.770.10
+0.68%
Golub Capital BDC

BACHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BACHF and IDCBY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BACHF and IDCBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BACHF
1D Price
Change %
BACHF100%
N/A
IDCBY - BACHF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.29%
BACHY - BACHF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
CICHY - BACHF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
SMFNF - BACHF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBVXF - BACHF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.79%
More

SMFNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMFNF has been loosely correlated with SMFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMFNF jumps, then SMFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMFNF
1D Price
Change %
SMFNF100%
N/A
SMFG - SMFNF
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.13%
MUFG - SMFNF
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.23%
CMWAY - SMFNF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.83%
HBCYF - SMFNF
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.80%
BACHF - SMFNF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More